From Contexts to Values: Context-Dependent Defeat in Abstract Argumentation
Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
arXiv:2608. 15536v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In value-based argumentation, an audience's ordering of values decides which attacks succeed as defeats.
arXiv:2605. 31581v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The same arguments often need to be evaluated under different external regimes.
arXiv:2608. 14004v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In-context learning is commonly formalized as inference from examples of a function.
arXiv:2609.00759v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly handle in-context learning (ICL) tasks where a long, novel context defines the rules, knowledge, and output s...
The paper proposes a transparent, user‑configurable rule for selecting arguments in deliberative polls, replacing opaque learned rankers. It formalises argument selection over bipolar justification sets, introduces seven civic recommender criteria, and presents a one‑hop reversed endorsement flow rule that meets them. Experiments on 17,000 simulated runs show the rule performs comparably to random on coverage but outperforms other methods on endorsement mass and robustness under adversarial pressure.
arXiv:2608.24888v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Agents that act on a user's behalf must plan differently for different users, and increasingly do so from some structured representation of user co...