arXiv Machine Learning
FireGraphNet: Sub-daily wildfire spread prediction with directed graph neural networks
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22
WildfireSpreadBench: The Metric Decides the Model in Wildfire Spread Prediction
WildfireSpreadBench evaluates machine‑learning models for predicting next‑day wildfire spread, comparing five discriminative and one generative architecture on the WildfireSpreadTS dataset. The study shows that model rankings differ markedly when using Average Precision versus threshold‑dependent metrics such as F1 and IoU, revealing three distinct prediction profiles—over‑predicting, balanced, and under‑predicting—that AP alone cannot distinguish. Expanding input channels modestly affected AP, underscoring that AP may favor models with predictions poorly suited for operational use.
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 9
A Graph Neural Network for Global Daily Fire Radiative Power Prediction at Medium-Range Lead Times
The paper presents a spatiotemporal graph neural network that predicts global fire radiative power (FRP) up to seven days ahead using recent observations and reanalysis data. Trained on 2020‑2022 data and evaluated for 2023‑2024, the model reproduces the seasonal FRP cycle and outperforms persistence, reducing mean squared error by 32–43% at one‑day lead and 24–40% at seven days at 0.1° resolution. While large fires are reliably detected, the model underestimates their radiative power and faces challenges in intensity calibration and small‑fire placement.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 17
Modular Deep Learning Mechanisms for Auditable Next-Day Wildfire Spread Prediction
The paper presents modular deep learning augmentations for next‑day wildfire spread prediction, including wind‑ and slope‑conditioned attention biases, physics‑feature retrieval‑augmented output correction, and fire‑conditioned dual‑stream gating. These modules are evaluated on five backbone models using the Next Day Wildfire Spread benchmark, with staged ablations, directional audits, retrieval perturbations, calibration measures, and computational comparisons. The best augmented SwinUNETR model achieves an F1 score of 0.4216 and an AUC‑PR of 0.3673, while a mixed ensemble reaches 0.4292 and 0.3790, demonstrating that predictive performance, operational trustworthiness, and computational practicality can be simultaneously improved.
arXiv AI
Sep 17
Interpretable Patch-Based Deep Learning for Wildfire Spread Prediction from Ensemble Simulations
The study evaluates deep learning surrogates for wildfire spread prediction, training four architectures on 10,584 high‑resolution simulations from Catalonia. Results show that only surface fuel load significantly predicts burn probability, and convolutional models mainly use distance to the fire front while a transformer model emphasizes fuel and terrain. When applied to a new region without retraining, the models still perform reasonably, with only a modest accuracy drop.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 7
Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Post-Wildfire Debris-Flow Prediction
arXiv:2608. 05265v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prediction of post-wildfire debris flows is critical for mitigating hazards to communities, infrastructure, and resources during intense rainfall in recently burned areas.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11
Neural-Parameterized Cellular Automata for Wildfire Spread
arXiv:2606. 11676v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Traditional wildfire models rely on rigid, low-dimensional parameters and static fuel maps, frequently underpredicting fire spread.