arXiv AI By Pratyush Chaudhari

ERTS: Adversarial Robustness Testing of Ethical AI via Semantic Perturbation in a Bounded Consequence Space

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 13282v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI systems are deployed in high-stakes ethical contexts such as healthcare triage, autonomous vehicle control, and employment screening, formal methods for evaluating their robustness against adversarial manipulation of ethical reasoning remain underdeveloped.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 5

Adversarial Stress Testing of Role-Playing Language Agents using Multi-Agent Evaluation

arXiv:2608. 03166v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Role-Playing Language Agents (RPLAs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes applications such as healthcare assistance, customer support, and education, where maintaining consistent personas, ethical constraints, and behavioral coherence under adversarial pressure is critical.

By Saqib Shouqi, Abdullah Nazly, Januki Wanniarachchi, Ravisha De Alwis
arXiv AI
Jul 1

Perturbation Effects on Robustness and Individual Fairness

arXiv:2404. 01356v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial perturbations that can simultaneously degrade prediction robustness and individual fairness across diverse application settings.

By Xuran Li, Hao Xue, Peng Wu, Xingjun Ma, Zhen Zhang, Huaming Chen, Flora D. Salim
arXiv AI
Jul 2

Adversarial Pragmatics for AI Safety Evaluation: A Benchmark for Instruction Conflict, Embedded Commands, and Policy Ambiguity

arXiv:2607. 01153v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safety evaluations for language models increasingly depend on judgments about ambiguous natural-language behaviour: whether a model has followed an instruction, refused appropriately, complied with a policy, resisted an embedded command, or misreported progress in an agentic task.

By Brett Reynolds