Can Humans Tell? A Dual-Axis Study of Human Perception of LLM-Generated News investigates whether people can distinguish news articles written by humans from those generated by large language models (LLMs). Using JudgeGPT, the study collected 2,318 judgments from 1,054 participants on content from six LLMs, finding that participants could not reliably differentiate machine-generated from human-written text. The research also shows that domain expertise predicts judgment accuracy, distinct response strategies exist, and accuracy declines after about 30 evaluations due to cognitive fatigue.
By Alexander Loth, Martin Kappes, Marc-Oliver Pahl
arXiv:2610.15961v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Emergent misalignment (EM) occurs when fine-tuning a language model to a narrow task makes it misaligned on unrelated ones. Because organizations now...
By Alex Mart\'i Guiu, Nicolas Zumarraga, Kevin O'Sullivan, Robert Jakob, Anna Hedstr\"om
arXiv:2607. 20487v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to answer questions about political information, including in election-adjacent information settings where factual errors and ideological distortions are high-stakes.
By Chendi Wang, Liam Cunningham, Tom Yishay, Jieying Chen
arXiv:2610.03077v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Propaganda detection is an essential task in natural language processing (NLP), particularly in the context of manipulative political communications. H...
By Claudiu Creanga, Ioachim Lihor, Liviu P. Dinu
Propaganda detection is an essential task in natural language processing (NLP), particularly in the context of manipulative political communications. However, identifying specific propaganda technique...
arXiv:2608.21389v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Generative AI enables customized misinformation at scale, yet defenses remain largely reactive. We present empirical findings from a human-subject st...
By Alexander Loth, Martin Kappes, Marc-Oliver Pahl