arXiv Computation and Language By Dikshya Mohanty, Manoj Praveen Nandigama, Kuldeepsinh Raj, Sourav Kanti Maiti, Jiannan Yang, Ruiqi Luo, Srinivasa Phani Madhav Marupudi, Mounika Geriki, Prayag Raghunandan, Puneet Lingutla, Tengfei Ma, Niranjan Balasubramanian, Nav Nidhi Rajput

ElectroChemLLM: A Multimodal LLM Pipeline for High-Fidelity Electrochemical Informatics

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

ElectroChemLLM is a multimodal large language model pipeline that extracts structured electrochemical records—such as electrolyte compositions, electrode materials, cell configurations, and measured physicochemical properties—from unstructured scientific PDFs. By combining hybrid document parsing with vision-capable LLM orchestration, it captures data across text, tables, and figures, achieving an F‑1 score of 0.97 on a benchmark of 232 battery‑electrolyte papers. The extracted data populate ElectroChemDB, a database of 15,000 research articles, which is then used to train machine learning models for electrolyte property prediction, demonstrating a full workflow from literature to materials discovery.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 2

ElectrolyteFM: Unifying Electrolyte Property Prediction through Cross-Property Knowledge Learning

ElectrolyteFM is a unified multi‑property prediction model designed to improve electrolyte formulation design by learning property‑specific representations and cross‑property knowledge through an expert pool and a routing mechanism. The model selectively incorporates shared information for each target property, using residual adapters to refine predictions. Experiments on the Electrolyte12 dataset show a 14.8% reduction in normalized mean absolute error across 12 properties, and on an unseen sodium‑electrolyte dataset it achieves a 6.7% lower conductivity mean absolute error compared to the best baseline.

By Jiaxin Yu, Shuo Wang, Peng Wang, Yongcai Wang, Deying Li
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 3

When Literature Data Mislead Artificial Intelligence in Materials Discovery

The article examines how scientific literature, often used as a data source for AI in materials science, can contain hidden inaccuracies such as text-figure mismatches, ambiguous axis labels, unit inconsistencies, and missing measurement context. By tracing solid electrolyte conductivity values from original papers to curated datasets, the authors uncover recurrent errors that are numerically plausible yet hard to detect, leading to significant label noise in AI models. A cross-database example demonstrates that ambiguous reporting can cause a 100‑fold error in conductivity values, underscoring the need for traceable reporting, rigorous curation, and validation practices in AI-driven discovery.

By Qian Wang, Ying Li, Ryuhei Sato, Hidemi Kato, Shin-ichi Orimo, Hao Li, Eric Jianfeng Cheng
arXiv AI
Oct 23

Automated Materials Data and Knowledge Extraction using Machine Learning and Large Language Models

The review traces the development of machine‑learning techniques for extracting materials data and knowledge from scientific literature, progressing from rule‑based pipelines to NLP models, transformer encoders, and finally large language models and agentic systems that handle text, tables, and figures. It highlights how these methods enable the creation of queryable materials databases, knowledge graphs, generic question answering, AI co‑scientists, chatbots, and closed‑loop discovery with autonomous labs. The paper critically evaluates datasets, extraction accuracy, computational costs, and offers practical guidelines, while outlining open challenges such as full tetrahedron extraction, benchmark scarcity, and terminology resolution.

By Aravindan Kamatchi Sundaram, B. Pabitramohan Prusty, Rohit Batra
arXiv AI
Oct 26

RxnExBench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Structured Chemical Reaction Extraction from Scientific Literature

RxnExBench is a multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate vision‑language models on the task of extracting structured chemical reaction data from dense figures in synthetic chemistry literature. The dataset, compiled from high‑impact journals, contains 3,565 expert‑annotated reactions and 2,361 molecular structures, organized under a unified schema of 15 reaction roles and 26 core fields. It also introduces a difficulty taxonomy, a modular annotation pipeline, and the Oracle‑MolRec protocol to separate molecular recognition from higher‑level reasoning, and shows that current state‑of‑the‑art models struggle as schema complexity and reasoning demands increase.

By Jiaxing Sun, Junyuan Gao, Ruikang Zhang, Hao Zheng, Lingli Ge, Xiao An, Jiang Wu, Huazheng Zeng, Jiahe Song, Chen Zhu, Haote Yang, Jingchao Wang, Lu Chen, Yuanyuan Cao, Ruijie Zhang, Shengxin Lu, Weijia Li, Lijun Wu, Conghui He