arXiv:2605.22878v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Artificial intelligence is rapidly entering the core workflows of scientific research. Yet reliable scientific reasoning requires access to accumul...
By Shuofei Qiao, Yunxiang Wei, Busheng Zhang, Mengru Wang, Jiazheng Fan, Huadong Jian, Bin Wu, Shumin Deng, Yida Xue, Zifan Cheng, Xiang Chen, Dan Zhang, Junfeng Fang, Ningyu Zhang, Keyan Ding, Qiang Zhang, Jeff Z. Pan, Emine Yilmaz, Huajun Chen
arXiv:2607. 20926v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific research involves complex information-seeking and reasoning workflows across heterogeneous sources.
By Yinhao Tang, Youqing Fang, Yanan Sun, Wenran Liu, Weiming Zhang, Bin Liu, Kuikun Liu, Wenwei Zhang, Kai Chen
The article examines how scientific literature, often used as a data source for AI in materials science, can contain hidden inaccuracies such as text-figure mismatches, ambiguous axis labels, unit inconsistencies, and missing measurement context. By tracing solid electrolyte conductivity values from original papers to curated datasets, the authors uncover recurrent errors that are numerically plausible yet hard to detect, leading to significant label noise in AI models. A cross-database example demonstrates that ambiguous reporting can cause a 100‑fold error in conductivity values, underscoring the need for traceable reporting, rigorous curation, and validation practices in AI-driven discovery.
By Qian Wang, Ying Li, Ryuhei Sato, Hidemi Kato, Shin-ichi Orimo, Hao Li, Eric Jianfeng Cheng
Accumulated scientific knowledge advances inquiry when prior findings help researchers choose new questions, design investigations, and interpret results. Realizing this value at scale requires access...
The paper introduces the Large Knowledge Model (LKM), a scientific knowledge infrastructure that converts research literature into shared, computationally accessible reasoning graphs. LKM aligns questions, claims, and reasoning chains across papers, creating a Scientific Reasoning Landscape with Question, Workflow, and Evidence views. The system enhances scientific search, evidence‑grounded QA, and research planning, achieving notable accuracy gains on ChemBench, PubMedQA, and SciBench.
By Yuan Huang, Sihan Hu, Hongyu Gu, Chao Ma, Jiaxing Zhang, Zhiyong Zou, Caiyu Fan, Yan Xiao, Mingjun Xu, Chenyu Xie, Mingzhen Ju, Zhehao Ma, Qi Zhang, Baozong Wang, Yu Li, Zhiyuan Yao, Ruoxue Liao, Xinyu Li, Linfeng Zhang, Kun Chen, Weinan E
arXiv:2606. 15497v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The automation of science is a long-standing ambition in the field of AI.
By Yutaro Yamada, Robert Tjarko Lange, Cong Lu, Chris Lu, Shengran Hu, Jakob Foerster, David Ha, Jeff Clune