arXiv Computation and Language
Does Machine Translation Retain Media Bias?
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
Related stories
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 21
Benchmarking Gender Bias in Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics across Occupations
The paper investigates gender bias in machine translation evaluation metrics using an occupation-balanced subset of GAMBIT+ across seven English‑source language pairs, including a new German extension. It finds that masculine translations tend to receive higher scores and that biases align with stereotypical gender representations, though the strength varies by evaluator and language. The study highlights that assessing bias requires multiple dimensions beyond a single aggregate measure.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 14
Translationese as a Rational Response to Translation Task Difficulty
arXiv:2603.12050v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Translated texts exhibit systematic differences from comparable texts originally written in the target language. Explaining this phenomenon, common...
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1
Beyond "To whom it may concern": Tailoring Machine Translation to Audience and Intent
The paper investigates how machine translation can be tailored to specific audiences and intents, a capability enabled by large language models (LLMs). By systematically evaluating purpose-driven MT across 50 languages, 5 model sizes, and 8 text domains, the authors find that explicit instructions significantly improve translation adaptiveness, especially for informal domains, larger models, and higher-resource languages. They also show that traditional MT metrics often penalize adapted translations and that models can self-generate useful instructions from context, closing a large portion of the adaptiveness gap.
arXiv AI
Sep 2
The Interlingua Hypothesis: LLMs Translate via a Latent Task-agnostic Feature Space
The paper proposes the interlingua hypothesis, suggesting that large language models translate by encoding a source sentence into a latent, task‑agnostic feature space and then decoding a target sentence from that space. Three lines of evidence support this: (1) BLEU variance across language pairs is largely explained by language‑specific competences without pair‑specific interactions; (2) many model components influence both monolingual and translation tasks; and (3) fine‑tuning on monolingual data recovers most translation gains seen with aligned documents. These findings converge to support the hypothesis and point toward new ways to understand and improve LLM translation.
arXiv AI
Jun 10
Emotion Profiling in LLM-Based Literary Translation: Systematic Shifts Across MT and Post-Editing
arXiv:2606. 10113v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper investigates whether LLM translations exhibit identifiable emotional profiles and how post-editing reshapes them toward human-like norms.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1
Evaluating Multilingual Sentence Embeddings for Translation Error Detection:An English--Greek Contrastive Study
arXiv:2608.28776v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multilingual sentence embeddings are increasingly used to estimate semantic similarity across languages, yet their sensitivity to fine-grained translat...