Hugging Face Trending Papers

Do Time-Series Forecasters Use the Right History: Recoverability, Recovery, and Functional Use of Temporal Delays

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

Forecast accuracy does not tell us which past inputs produced a prediction. We separate three questions for time-series models with known delay structure: can the true delay be recovered from the observed data, does the model report it, and does the forecast actually use the same history?

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 25

Time-Series Foundation Models That Understand Data Revisions

The paper introduces VINTAGE-TS, a revision‑aware time‑series foundation model that separates observation time from information‑availability time. It predicts both the next period’s first‑published value and the value available after a fixed delay, maintaining a joint distribution to capture their dependence and uncertainty. The authors provide a detailed evaluation protocol, software tools for validity‑interval reconstruction and delayed‑label filtering, and a synthetic demonstration with a 25‑configuration sensitivity suite to illustrate performance variability and the impact of hindsight contamination.

By Taimoor Ahmad
arXiv AI
Sep 4

RATL: Learning from Retrieved Residuals for Robust Multivariate Time-Series Forecasting

RATL is a plug‑in method for multivariate time‑series forecasting that uses a frozen base forecaster to build a memory of its historical forecast residuals. During inference, RATL retrieves residual trajectories from similar past contexts and employs a set‑aware router to combine them, providing learned feedback correction. Experiments demonstrate that this residual‑retrieval approach improves the performance of the base forecaster across various benchmarks and backbones.

By Yuchen He, Yueyang Cang, Zhiyuan Ning, Ningyu Wang, Li Shi