arXiv Computer Vision
Do Satellites See Commuters? A Critical Benchmark of Vision Foundation Models
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Aug 19
MoRA: Mobility as the Backbone for Geospatial Representation Learning at Scale
MoRA is a human‑centric geospatial representation learning framework that uses a large mobility graph as its backbone to fuse spatial tokenization, graph neural networks, and asymmetric contrastive learning. It aligns over 100 million points of interest, massive remote sensing imagery, and structured demographic data with a billion‑edge mobility graph, producing compact 128‑dimensional embeddings that capture socio‑economic context and functional roles of locations. On a benchmark of nine downstream social and economic prediction tasks, MoRA outperforms state‑of‑the‑art models by an average of 12.9% and demonstrates scaling behavior analogous to large language models.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23
MIND the Gap: A Geographic Implicit Neural Representation with Adjustable Spatial Scale
The paper introduces MIND, a method that distills specialist geospatial model embeddings into a single generalist coordinate embedding with adjustable spatial granularity, using nested supervision across multiple embedding dimensions. MIND’s design allows downstream predictors to use only leading chunks or apply a Chunked Penalty to downweight finer details without retraining the INR. The authors evaluate MIND on CoordBench, a large INR benchmark of 52 datasets and 78 targets, and report that MIND and its Chunked Penalty variant achieve the highest regression and classification scores, especially under regional holdout, establishing a new state‑of‑the‑art for geographic implicit neural representations.
arXiv AI
Jun 15
How do Self-Supervised Remote Sensing Vision Models Transfer to Downstream Tasks?
arXiv:2606. 13896v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Self-supervised geospatial foundation models (GeoFMs) learn transferable representations from remote sensing data, but their downstream behavior is difficult to characterize.
arXiv AI
Aug 25
What Does CLIP Learn for Regional Geolocalization? Probing Visual Cues and Scene Configuration After Adaptation
arXiv:2608.21761v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large collections of street-view imagery provide rich visual information about urban environments, but extracting fine-grained geographic information f...
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 21
Far from the Crowd: Scalable Self-Supervised Learning via Geographic Isolation
arXiv:2608. 19766v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Self-supervised pretraining on remote sensing imagery typically treats all samples as equally informative, despite large variability in geographic and visual structure.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 29
Do Location Encoders Capture Spatial Effects? A GeoShapley Benchmark Across Scales
Location encoders transform geographic coordinates into high‑dimensional embeddings for machine learning, yet it is unclear how well these embeddings capture interpretable spatial effects. This study benchmarks GeoShapley—a game‑theoretic explainer treating all location features as a single joint player—against eleven TorchSpatial encoders on a synthetic process with known coefficients, across grid, county, and global scales, with and without raw coordinates and under different training regimes. The results show that primary coefficient recovery is consistently high across encoders, while secondary coefficient recovery varies more with scale, especially at the global level, and raw‑coordinate baselines remain competitive throughout.