arXiv AI By Jihan Kim

Divergent strategies and convergent outcomes in autonomous materials discovery

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The study examined sixteen independent runs of a single autonomous materials discovery model, each given the same database of 12,499 metal‑organic frameworks and tasked with optimizing methane storage. The agents’ strategies varied widely, screening between 100 and 5,000 structures and constructing 2,253 hypothetical frameworks, yet all converged on the same high‑performance materials frontier near 200 cm³ cm⁻³. Even when half the agents were subjected to stricter checks, the overall conclusions remained unchanged, revealing both robust findings and a shared error stemming from an incomplete database entry.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 24

An LLM agent for end-to-end computational materials discovery

MAESTRO is a large language model agent that automates the full screening pipeline for metal‑organic frameworks (MOFs). It parses extensive MOF literature, links publications to crystal structures, curates a computation‑ready database, and then applies a progressively more expensive computational strategy to identify promising candidates. The identified materials for wet flue gas separation come from unrelated studies, demonstrating the agent’s ability to uncover high‑performance materials across domains.

By Chen Yuntong, Huang Ju, Liu Yu, Zhao Dan, Sun Mingqi, Ju Chentian, Liu Yanbing, Huang Lijiang, Zhao Guobin
arXiv AI
Aug 28

Accelerating Scientific Research with Gemini in the Real-World

The paper extends Co‑Scientist, a Gemini‑based multi‑agent system, and validates it in real‑world scientific settings. In materials science it designed a safe precursor route for MXenes and achieved single‑attempt growth of monolayer MoS₂, MoSe₂, and WS₂. In biology it predicted swarming phenotypes of engineered E. coli, and in computer science it discovered a superior inference‑time scaling architecture for HealthBench. A double‑blind study with 30 experts showed that Co‑Scientist’s reliability modules reduce hallucination and plagiarism while improving research safety.

By Samuel Schmidgall, Xiaokai Zhu, Marian Shaw, Lin Yang, Valentin Li\'{e}vin, Jingyun Yang, Yuchen Zhuang, Tim Strother, Alex Bijamov, Min Woo Sun, Anil Palepu, Justin Chen, David Steiner, Jacqueline Shreibati, Wei-Hung Weng, Yilin Zhao, Xingjian Hu, Nicholas Zahn, Sadhya Garg, Julia Kirby, Yuxiang Gan, Jiaoli Li, Divy Thakkar, Shekoofeh Azizi, David Racz, Juraj Gottweis, Vivek Natarajan, Chenglin Wu, Tal Danino, Keran Rong, Haozhe Wang, Benoit Schillings, Yong Cheng, Quoc V. Le, Tao Tu
arXiv AI
Oct 5

MOF-VERIFY: A Failure-Aware Agentic Harness for MOF Hypothesis Verification

MOF-VERIFY is a failure-aware agentic harness designed to improve hypothesis verification for metal‑organic frameworks (MOFs). It introduces a diagnostic benchmark with four task families—structural grounding, synthesis‑condition verification, evidence‑sufficiency verification, and MLIP‑based computational verification—to pinpoint failures in knowledge access, evidence acquisition, and reasoning. Guided by these diagnostics, MOF‑Verify addresses structural, literature, evidence‑sufficiency, and computational bottlenecks, achieving significant performance gains over direct inference and retrieval‑based baselines across multiple large language models.

By Donghyun Lee, Taehoon Lee, Geonhee Ahn, Jieun Kim, Jihyun Park, Suyeon Cho, Yoona Kim, Chaerim Shin, Hoi Ri Moon, Jonggeol Na, Sukho Hong, Jihwan Oh, Soo Kyung Kim
arXiv AI
Oct 12

From Benchmark to Bench: Can Agents Survive Real-World Drug Discovery?

The paper introduces MAGI, an open modular agent that orchestrates molecular‑design tools by setting objectives, launching optimization, interpreting structure–activity relationships, and adjusting strategy. In nine retrospective lead‑optimization campaigns from three pharmaceutical companies, MAGI produced valid molecules via either direct LLM generation or delegation to REINVENT 4; LLM proposals stayed closer to local chemistry and achieved comparable or higher activity with fewer operations, while REINVENT explored broader chemical space. The success of a campaign depended on the accuracy of predictive models rather than the generation route, and a blinded evaluation showed chemists could not distinguish MAGI’s outputs from expert‑generated compounds, though the SAR reasoning was deemed plausible yet incomplete. The study positions MAGI as a coordination layer that can be plugged into existing workflows, but notes that the current ceiling for real projects is set by scorer applicability rather than tool orchestration.

By Pierre Llompart, Levent Guner, Helen Lai, Alessandro Tibo, Yijie Xu