arXiv:2607. 10559v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) offer a highly modular platform for adsorptive gas separation, yet their vast reticular design space makes inverse design difficult under simultaneous constraints of chemical validity, separation performance, and structural diversity.
By Zhaolin Hu, Hehe Fan, Wangyihan Guo, Meng Xu, Chenhao Rao, Qiwei Yang, Yi Yang
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) offer a highly modular platform for adsorptive gas separation, yet their vast reticular design space makes inverse design difficult under simultaneous constraints of chemical validity, separation performance, and structural diversity. Here, we present LEMO Agent, a large-language-model agent framework for closed-loop inverse design of gas-separation MOFs in MOFid space.
arXiv:2606. 29459v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Inverse design of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) requires searching a combinatorially vast space where property labels are expensive and most machine-learning models reveal little about why a structure succeeds.
By Kyungmin Nam, Seunghee Han, Jihan Kim
arXiv:2608. 11283v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Computation-ready metal-organic framework (MOF) databases are essential for high-throughput screening, yet many reported crystal structures remain chemically unreasonable or disordered, compromising simulation fidelity.
By Guobin Zhao, Xiao-Yan Li
arXiv:2604. 20899v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Scalable synthesis remains the gate between MOF discovery and industrial deployment, as scale-up know-how is fragmented across disparate reports.
By Peter Walther, Hongrui Sheng, Xinxin Liu, Bin Feng, Reid Coyle, Xinhua Yan, Kyle Smith, Harrison Kayal, Shyam Chand Pal, Zhiling Zheng
MOF-VERIFY is a failure-aware agentic harness designed to improve hypothesis verification for metal‑organic frameworks (MOFs). It introduces a diagnostic benchmark with four task families—structural grounding, synthesis‑condition verification, evidence‑sufficiency verification, and MLIP‑based computational verification—to pinpoint failures in knowledge access, evidence acquisition, and reasoning. Guided by these diagnostics, MOF‑Verify addresses structural, literature, evidence‑sufficiency, and computational bottlenecks, achieving significant performance gains over direct inference and retrieval‑based baselines across multiple large language models.
By Donghyun Lee, Taehoon Lee, Geonhee Ahn, Jieun Kim, Jihyun Park, Suyeon Cho, Yoona Kim, Chaerim Shin, Hoi Ri Moon, Jonggeol Na, Sukho Hong, Jihwan Oh, Soo Kyung Kim