arXiv:2602. 22600v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Training selects for behavior, not circuitry: many weight configurations can implement the same function.
By Joshua S. Schiffman
We present a theoretical framework to explain the emergence of inductive reasoning abilities in Transformer language models. While previous works on Transformer learning dynamics have so far been mostly tied to specific tasks, we study a generalized class of inductive tasks that unifies several synthetic tasks known in the literature, including in-context n-grams and multi-hop reasoning.
arXiv:2607. 11875v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present a theoretical framework to explain the emergence of inductive reasoning abilities in Transformer language models.
By Tiberiu Musat, Tiago Pimentel, Nicholas Zucchet, Thomas Hofmann
arXiv:2410. 24050v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large-scale pretraining of transformers has been central to the success of foundation models.
By Ambroise Odonnat, Wassim Bouaziz, Vivien Cabannes
The paper investigates how transformer models learn latent structure by training a small decoder-only transformer on three variants of the Alchemy benchmark. It finds that the model acquires different components of latent structure in discrete stages, with a notable asymmetry: it robustly composes fundamental transitions but struggles to decompose complex examples into atomic transitions. Layer‑specific causal interventions reveal plasticity windows where freezing layers delays or prevents stage completion, offering a detailed view of capability evolution during training.
By Rohan Saha, Farzane Aminmansour, Alona Fyshe
Relational BabyLM is a decoder‑only Transformer that replaces standard self‑attention with a Dual Attention Transformer (DAT) to separate object‑level lexical features from structural/relational information. The model incorporates a Next‑Latent Prediction objective to compress history into a dense belief state and introduces a RoPE‑based symbol‑retrieval mechanism. On the BabyLM 2026 challenge, the best model ranks 6th overall and 3rd on the NLP‑task subset, outperforming GPT‑2 on most benchmarks and achieving the highest EWoK score among strict‑track entries.
By Adrian Brasoveanu, Ece Takmaz, Jakub Dotla\v{c}il