The paper introduces a new training framework for Visual Question Answering that leverages counterfactual contrastive learning to mitigate language bias and improve out‑of‑distribution generalization. It comprises a three‑stage curriculum for stable optimization, an enhanced Batch‑Contrastive loss for discriminative feature learning, and two regularizers—Answer‑Contrastive and Gradient‑Discrepancy—to refine predictions and enforce causal visual grounding. The resulting model attains 61.64% accuracy on the bias‑sensitive VQA‑CP v2 benchmark while maintaining 62.80% on the standard VQA v2 dataset, achieving a small generalization gap of 1.16%.
By Truong-Binh Duong, Thanh-Ngan Tran, Ngoc-Thao Nguyen, Bac Le
arXiv:2608.22429v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) capable of thinking with images often rely on external tools for fine-grained perception. However, this relian...
By Changjiang Jiang, Qiannian Zhao, Lei Xin, Jinxiang Xie, Preslav Nakov, Zhuohan Xie
arXiv:2609.31456v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) often struggle with compositional reasoning tasks, but the reasons for this underperformance remain unclear. A common hyp...
By Mona Gandhi, Cenk Merih Olcay, Kuan-Chieh Lo, Santiago Castro, Christopher W. Myers, Srinivasan Parthasarathy
arXiv:2609.35942v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recent work in visual question answering has shown that vision-language models can exhibit strong reasoning capabilities by translating visual inputs i...
By Ting-Chih Chen, Emile van Krieken, Shujian Yu, Filip Ilievski
arXiv:2608.30584v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Despite the impressive progress of recent MLLMs on spatio-temporal video grounding (STVG), existing evaluations and training data focus primarily on si...
By Xingjian Wang, Shijian Wang, Yibo Wang, Zihao Yu, Runhao Fu, Xuelian Cheng, Zongyuan Ge
The paper introduces V‑Rubrics, a reinforcement‑learning framework that evaluates vision‑language model responses by breaking them into atomic propositions and scoring them on Visual Faithfulness, Reasoning Consistency, and Instruction Following. Using a fine‑tuned Qwen3‑VL‑8B‑Instruct model and a newly created 50K‑example V‑Rubrics dataset, the authors demonstrate that rubric‑based GRPO outperforms both a shared SFT baseline and an answer‑only GRPO, especially on knowledge‑oriented and visually grounded reasoning tasks.
By Shulin Tian, Minglun Li, Yuhao Dong, Hao Ding, Jiarui Yao, Haiwen Diao, Jingkang Yang, Hongyuan Zhu, Ziwei Liu