arXiv:2606. 08594v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep learning EEG denoising architectures have scaled from tens of thousands to tens of millions of parameters, yet no prior study has isolated model capacity as the experimental variable or tested whether reconstruction metrics predict downstream neural-signal utility.
By Jasmeet Singh Bindra, Siddharth Panwar, Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury
arXiv:2605. 14941v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals are highly susceptible to artifacts, resulting in a low signal-to-noise ratio, which makes extraction of meaningful neural information challenging.
By Shantanu Sarkar, Jose L. Contreras-Vidal
arXiv:2606. 24087v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reconstructing continuous speech from scalp electroencephalography (EEG) remains fundamentally challenging.
By Wenhao Gao, Yifan Wang, Yijia Ma, Carl Yang, Wen Li, Chenyu You
arXiv:2607. 05165v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Non-invasive brain-to-speech decoding aims to restore communication to patients suffering from neurodegenerative disease, without the risks of neurosurgery.
By Benjamin Ballyk, Teyun Kwon, Miran \"Ozdogan, Oiwi Parker Jones
arXiv:2606. 23707v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: EEG spatial super-resolution (EEGSR) in real deployments is challenged by random channel missingness, unstable electrode quality, and changing visible-channel patterns caused by bad contacts or device variability.
By Hongjun Liu, Leyu Zhou, Zijianghao Yang, Chao Yao
arXiv:2607. 11530v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decoding continuous three-dimensional (3D) motor imagery (MI) using non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain--computer interfaces (BCIs) remains challenging due to signal variability and residual decoding errors.
By Jiamian Li, Niall McShane, Attila Korik, Naomi du Bois, Karl McCreadie, Leen Jabban, Benjamin Metcalfe, \"Ozg\"ur \c{S}im\c{s}ek, Damien Coyle