arXiv Computation and Language By Aziida Nanyonga, Mustafa Tahsin Yilmaz, Saad Ezzini, Ugur Turhan, Graham Wild

Decomposed Relation Extraction from Aviation Accident Narratives: Evaluating Transformer-Based Safety Knowledge Discovery under Relational Sparsity

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper investigates relation extraction from aviation accident narratives, noting that true safety relations are extremely sparse among concept pairs. It evaluates a decomposed framework that separates relation classification from concept identification, using a benchmark of 300 NTSB narratives expanded to 21,038 candidate pairs, of which only 248 represent key safety relations. Experiments with a TF‑IDF SVM and a weighted RoBERTa classifier show high false‑positive rates and a significant drop in performance from development to exhaustive evaluation, highlighting challenges in controlling false positives and managing candidate‑space sparsity.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 24

Structuring occupational accident narratives for cross-sector safety analysis: Transferability of accident-process role classification

The study investigates whether a model trained on construction‑sector occupational accident narratives can accurately classify accident‑process roles in other sectors and reporting environments. Using 42,244 factual units from 6,040 construction narratives, the authors compared TF‑IDF, frozen pretrained representations, and task‑adapted pretrained models, achieving up to 85.7% balanced accuracy without retraining. The models performed consistently across metallurgy, chemistry‑plastics, and an independent company corpus, though performance varied more on the latter due to differing reporting practices.

By Aho Yapi, Pierre Latouche, Arnaud Guillin, Yan Bailly
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 21

Cross-sector generalization of accident-process role classification in occupational accident narratives

The study evaluates how well accident‑process role classifiers trained on construction‑sector French occupational accident narratives generalize to other sectors. An expert‑annotated corpus classifies factual units into four roles—work situation, unfavourable condition, accident event, and consequence—and the classifiers are tested on unseen metallurgy, chemistry‑plastics, and company corpora without retraining. Task‑specific adaptation consistently outperforms frozen representations, achieving balanced accuracies of 85.6%–85.8% across the target domains.

By Aho Yapi, Pierre Latouche, Arnaud Guillin, Yan Bailly
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 16

Crash Narrative-Guided Countermeasure Recommendation Using Large Language Models: A Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Intersection Safety

arXiv:2609.15997v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Improving safety at intersections requires identifying crash mechanisms and recommending appropriate countermeasures. However, this process tradition...

By Abu Saif Md Nasim Uddin, Mohamed Abdel-Aty, Zubayer Islam, Parvez Anowar, Chenzhu Wang
arXiv AI
Aug 6

Traceable LLM-Generated Hazard Scenarios for Operational Safety Analysis of Aviation Systems Using ASRS Reports

arXiv:2608. 04697v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Operational hazard analysis of aviation system operations must consider interactions among weather, ATC actions, airspace constraints, aircraft operations, and human factors - distinct from the functional hazard assessment applied at the aircraft-system level.

By Cristian Mascia, Roberto Pietrantuono, Daniel Rodriguez, Stefano Russo
arXiv AI
Sep 23

Toward Auditable and Calibrated AI for Dementia-Related Crash Severity Prediction: A Selective Deferral Framework to Support Human Review

The paper presents a decision‑aware framework for predicting dementia‑related crash severity that emphasizes auditability and selective deferral. Using 4,781 Texas crash records, the authors evaluate several models—including structured, narrative, fusion, calibrated fusion, BERT‑family, and local large‑language‑model baselines—under a stratified 70/15/15 split. The leakage‑controlled Gemma model achieves the highest macro‑F1 of 0.545, while a calibrated fusion model reaches 0.522 macro‑F1 with an expected calibration error of 0.033; selective deferral further improves performance, raising macro‑F1 to 0.573 at 70% coverage and reducing severity cost to 0.577.

By Gaurab Chhetri, Anika Baitullah, Subasish Das