arXiv AI By Yixin Liu, Kang Yin, Hye-Bin Shin, Seong-Whan Lee

Decoding Error-Related Potentials under Multisensory Feedback with Varying Congruency

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 24806v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Error-related potentials (ErrPs) are widely studied neural signatures associated with error processing in human-machine interaction.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 12

Exploring Diffusion Transformers for Cross-Modal Augmentation in Multimodal Brain State Decoding

The paper introduces CoMA-DiT, a bidirectional cross‑modal Diffusion Transformer that uses paired modalities as mutual generative supervision for latent augmentation rather than just inputs for fusion. By conditioning velocity prediction on the paired modality through cross‑modal attention and injecting variation via a reliability‑gated residual mechanism, CoMA‑DiT improves multimodal brain state decoding. Experiments on auditory attention decoding and emotion recognition show consistent gains over 20 baselines, with absolute accuracy and macro‑F1 improvements of 4.28% and 6.70% respectively, and extensive analyses confirm its robustness and interpretability.

By Ziwei Wang, Xingyi He, Hongbin Wang, Tianwang Jia, Bohan Fang, Dongrui Wu
arXiv AI
Sep 10

BIFTA: Brain-Inspired Few-Shot Tactile Adaptation for Unknown Sensors

The paper introduces BIFTA, a Brain‑Inspired Few‑Shot Tactile Adaptation framework that enables a frozen encoder to adapt quickly to an unknown tactile sensor using only a small labeled support set. It preserves pretrained representations via dual‑view statistical memory, builds support‑conditioned spectral graphs to correct sensor‑dependent feature neighborhoods, and employs uncertainty‑gated recurrent propagation to reinforce reliable cross‑query evidence. Benchmarks on three tactile datasets demonstrate that BIFTA dramatically improves adaptation performance, achieving an 87.09% mean Sparsh accuracy on SITR with just 10% labeled data—an increase of 47.22 percentage points over the best prior method.

By Boheng Liu, Ziyu Li, Xia Wu