arXiv:2606. 26794v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: CLIP and its variants are widely adopted visual backbones in multimodal systems, but their pretraining remains dominated by descriptive image-text alignment.
By Sicheng Zhang, Muzammal Naseer, Binzhu Xie, Naufal Suryanto, Shi Qiu, Jamal Bentahar, Naveed Akhtar, Mubarak Shah
arXiv:2609.31456v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) often struggle with compositional reasoning tasks, but the reasons for this underperformance remain unclear. A common hyp...
By Mona Gandhi, Cenk Merih Olcay, Kuan-Chieh Lo, Santiago Castro, Christopher W. Myers, Srinivasan Parthasarathy
arXiv:2606. 13288v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Contrastively trained vision-language models like CLIP, have made remarkable progress in learning joint image-text representations, but still face challenges in compositional understanding.
By Wei Li, Zhen Huang, Xinmei Tian
The paper introduces Auto-Comp, a fully automated, concept-driven pipeline that generates photorealistic compositional benchmarks for vision‑language models. Auto‑Comp creates paired Minimal and Contextual samples for each concept, enabling isolation of core binding abilities from visio‑linguistic complexity. Evaluations across 25 models reveal consistent failures in attribute and relational binding, with context helping relational tasks but hindering attribute tasks due to visual clutter.
By Cristian Sbrolli, Toshihiko Yamasaki, Matteo Matteucci
Pretrained vision-language models such as CLIP excel at zero-shot recognition but often fail at compositionality, particularly attribute-object and relational structures. Recent studies mitigate this...
arXiv:2609.00709v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models produce fluent image descriptions but offer limited semantic control: users cannot reliably specify whether captions sho...
By Jongyeop Hyun, Taeyoung Kim, Hyounghun Kim