arXiv AI
CrystalJev: thinking fast and slow with atomistic foundation models for materials discovery
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
5d ago
CrystalJev: calibrated foundation-model probabilities decide what to compute next in materials discovery
arXiv:2610.06985v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Atomistic foundation models screen hypothetical crystals by thresholding predicted energies, an output that states neither how likely a candi...
arXiv AI
Sep 11
uFlowCSP: Crystal Structure Prediction using Mean flow generative models
uFlowCSP is a MeanFlow-based crystal structure prediction model that learns the average probability‑flow velocity, enabling it to generate complete crystal structures in one to five network evaluations. It achieves inference speeds 5×–58× faster than diffusion and flow‑matching methods while matching or surpassing their performance, with a chemistry‑ and symmetry‑aware Transformer that uses canonical atom ordering and per‑token chemistry embeddings. On the MP‑20 benchmark, uFlowCSP attains comparable or higher accuracy with far fewer evaluations and significantly lower wall‑clock time, demonstrating improved accuracy per network evaluation.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 3
Fast Organic Crystal Structure Prediction with Unit Cell Flow Matching
arXiv:2606. 03199v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Organic crystal structure prediction (CSP) is a requirement for computational modelling of organic solids, but traditionally costs several CPU-years per molecule.
arXiv AI
Jul 1
Surrogate-Gated Generation and Foundation-Model Embeddings for Bayesian Materials Design
arXiv:2606. 28578v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Closed-loop materials discovery iterates between proposing candidate structures and evaluating their properties, and property evaluation dominates the cost.
arXiv AI
Sep 30
Where Should Physics Enter a Molecular Crystal Generator?
The paper introduces CrystAF, an all‑atom crystal flow‑map generation model, and evaluates where physics should be incorporated into generative crystal structure models. By applying physics‑informed post‑training, the authors improve molecular validity and crystal packing without altering sampling speed, while inference‑time corrections further refine the structures. The study demonstrates that post‑training and inference‑time physics are complementary, and that the post‑training approach transfers to other generators such as Clari‑M and MolCrystalFlow.
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 2
Let CSP Be Your ANCHOR: Adaptive Crystal Search over Frozen Structure Priors
The paper proposes ANCHOR, a composition policy that decouples crystal structure prediction (CSP) from de novo crystal generation (DNG) by using a frozen CSP model as a fixed evaluator and training the policy with multi‑objective rewards, including adaptive novelty. ANCHOR significantly improves metrics such as MSUN and SUN compared to traditional DNG approaches, and demonstrates transferability across different CSP backbones and distillation into Crystalite‑CSP. The study shows that fine‑tuning DNG models directly on these rewards yields limited gains, whereas the ANCHOR framework better leverages the CSP prior for more efficient crystal discovery.