CrossMambaTuning: Synergistic Spatial and Cross-Layer Adaptation for Machine Vision Compression
Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
CrossMambaTuning is a new framework that adapts pretrained learned image compression models to machine vision tasks with minimal retraining. It combines State Space Models with cross‑layer interaction, featuring a Mamba adapter that uses task‑specific prompts and multi‑scale branching, and a Scale‑Invariant Cross‑Layer Adapter (SICA) that shares parameters across scales to reduce redundancy. Experiments show that this approach achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance while cutting parameter overhead by 72% compared to existing methods.
arXiv:2606. 01503v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Unified vision-language models (VLMs) integrate visual understanding and visual generation within a single autoregressive backbone, but their joint training is computationally expensive and largely overlooked from an efficiency perspective.
arXiv:2605.12491v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Vision Transformers (ViTs) learn rich visual-semantic representations through all-to-all self-attention among patch tokens. However, this design im...
arXiv:2607. 02612v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision Transformers achieve strong image classification accuracy but process all image regions with nearly the same computation, even when many regions are redundant or uninformative.
arXiv:2609.24337v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Mamba-based models have shown strong potential for long sequence modeling, adapting them to vision is challenging due to the requirement of local...
LoopVAE introduces a recurrent depth architecture that reuses a scale‑ and loop‑conditioned core across different spatial scales while keeping resolution‑changing transitions separate. The four‑block core applies 28 block operations per encoder or decoder, enabling a 29M‑parameter convolutional model to achieve 0.28 rFID and 32.54 dB PSNR on ImageNet‑256 with roughly 65% fewer parameters than comparable VAEs. Experiments with both convolutional and Transformer operators, as well as ablations on parameter sharing, demonstrate competitive image quality metrics and reveal how targeted loop interventions and truncation affect reconstruction quality and computational trade‑offs.