arXiv:2607. 06179v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: There are some datasets of varying scales for audio classification (AC) applied to different tasks.
By Hong Lyu, Mingru Yang, Qianhua He, Yanxiong Li, Jinxin Huang, Zhengyu Pei
arXiv:2607. 13555v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Bioacoustic call-type classification relies on costly expert annotation.
By Shiqi Zhang, Marius Fai{\ss}, Ariana Strandburg-Peshkin, Tuomas Virtanen
arXiv:2607. 01297v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Most existing audio classification methods suppose that each query (testing) sample belongs to a class of support (training) samples, and misrecognize samples of unseen classes as seen classes (cannot reject samples of unseen classes).
By Yanxiong Li, Jiaxin Tan, Qianqian Li, Guoqing Chen, Sen Huang, Tuomas Virtanen
arXiv:2606. 29901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sound event detection (SED) is a core module for acoustic environmental analysis, yet its performance is often limited by scarce labeled data.
By Nian Shao, Xian Li, Xiaofei Li
arXiv:2605. 13672v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Few-shot classification (FSC) is widely used for learning from limited labeled data, yet most evaluations implicitly assume that target concepts are independent of contextual cues.
By Giries Abu Ayoub, Morad Tukan, Loay Mualem
arXiv:2607. 06063v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Eco-acoustic monitoring generates vast volumes of audio data, making active learning a promising approach for reducing annotation effort while efficiently training reliable biodiversity classifiers.
By Hugo Magaldi, Gabriel Dubus