arXiv AI By Ryota Takamido, Hiroki Nakamoto

Counterfactual Optimization of Baseball Pitch Sequences and Estimation of Its Impact on Season-Level Statistics

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 17345v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Although pitch sequencing is a central topic in baseball analytics, previous studies have primarily focused on optimizing the final pitch within a single plate appearance, leaving the role of preceding setup pitches and their impact on long-term season-level performance insufficiently examined.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 7

A Fairness Audit of the Duckworth-Lewis-Stern Method: Format-Specific and Gender-Differential Bias, with an Interpretable Calibration Layer for Cricket Target Revision

The paper audits the Duckworth‑Lewis‑Stern (DLS) method, the standard for revising cricket scores after rain, using 8,150 international matches to generate 233,550 synthetic interruption scenarios. It finds two structured biases: a 137‑run prediction error range across match‑state buckets and a gender‑differential bias in ODIs, with women’s scores over‑predicted by an average of +7.63 runs versus +1.51 runs for men. The authors benchmark DLS against five modern machine‑learning models and introduce DLS‑Cal, a lightweight calibration layer that reduces overall bias by 31% in ODIs and 19% in T20Is, and a gender‑aware variant that nearly eliminates the residual bias for women’s ODIs.

By Soumyadeep Roy
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

When Minute-Resolution Monitoring Meets Session-Level Injury Labels: Landmark-Based Discrimination in Elite Women's Football

The study introduces a framework that reconciles minute‑resolution athlete monitoring data with injury labels that are only available at the session level. By creating fixed‑time landmarks (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 minutes) and generating a single representation per athlete‑session up to each landmark, the authors evaluate several machine‑learning models and data‑augmentation strategies on elite women’s football data. Results show that discrimination varies across landmarks, with TabPFN outperforming Logistic Regression at later landmarks but not consistently beating Random Forest, and that synthetic augmentation offers benefits only in specific conditions.

By Evangelos Chatzidimitriou, Konstantinos Tserpes