arXiv AI By Qikun Cai, Tao Huang, Chen Hou

Cost-Efficient Privacy Enforcement for Email-Generating LLM Agents under Strategic Information Requests

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper proposes a cost‑efficient privacy enforcement method for email‑generating large language model (LLM) agents that intercepts drafts, creates an information‑release contract, rewrites the draft locally with a Gemma rewriter, and then optionally calls a final PrivacyChecker. Experiments on normal and strategically malicious prompts show that the Gemma + Checker approach reduces leakage from 11.41 % to 4.03 % and improves usable output rates, while also cutting the cost amplification of checker‑only pipelines from 1.32× to 1.02×. The results demonstrate that moving repair to a cheaper local layer can significantly lower both privacy leakage and operational cost, yet still rely on a checker for high‑risk sends.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 31

Judging Before Propagation: Task-Graph Contextual Integrity for Multi-Agent Privacy

The paper introduces Task-Graph Contextual Integrity (TG‑CI), a formalism that extends traditional Contextual Integrity to multi‑agent systems by modeling workflows as Multi‑Agent Task Graphs (MATGs). TG‑CI evaluates privacy not just at individual disclosures but across the entire downstream propagation, offering two enforcement policies—Full‑Scope and Auto‑Region—that balance privacy protection with task performance. A new benchmark, MAPLE‑Bench, demonstrates that TG‑CI can cut unauthorized disclosures by up to 94% while preserving over 94% of task accuracy compared to existing local‑history CI methods.

By Hengyu Wu, Blaise Delattre, Yang Cao