Copying As Defense: Protecting Images from Editing By Eliciting Model Copying
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
arXiv:2608.21229v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Omnimodal generation is central to a wide range of content creation and editing applications. In-context conditioning is essential to this paradigm. It...
arXiv:2607. 21318v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Replacing an object with one that differs in category or shape requires complete source removal, natural target formation unconstrained by the source silhouette, and preservation of unrelated content.
arXiv:2606. 09901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Diffusion-based generative models enable powerful image editing capabilities, but achieving precise control while maintaining fidelity and safety remains challenging.
arXiv:2606. 14125v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Inversion-based image editing offers flexible and training-free control but still struggles with inversion accuracy and the trade-off between editing fidelity and background preservation.
RefineEdit is a training‑free prompt‑to‑prompt image editing framework that uses a Generative Refinement Network to edit images by refining binary image codes. It couples edit localization with content generation, selecting editable positions based on signed probability differences between an editing branch and a source branch, and stabilizes edits with adaptive spatial freezing and finite bit locking. The method requires no additional training, external masks, or attention control, and outperforms other methods on PIE‑Bench in background‑preservation metrics and CLIP scores.
arXiv:2603. 00133v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generative models have been shown to "memorize" certain training data, leading to verbatim or near-verbatim generating images, which may cause privacy concerns or copyright infringement.