arXiv:2607. 21318v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Replacing an object with one that differs in category or shape requires complete source removal, natural target formation unconstrained by the source silhouette, and preservation of unrelated content.
By Jian Zhang, Zhijun Zhang
Replacing an object with one that differs in category or shape requires complete source removal, natural target formation unconstrained by the source silhouette, and preservation of unrelated content. Existing training-free editors either localize edits from terminal predictions under source and target prompts or preserve unrelated content through spatially unselective source-feature reuse without explicit region discovery.
SR-Edit is a new image editing framework that uses iterative self‑refinement to improve fidelity. At each step it extracts precise, self‑consistent region separations from the model’s predictions and then enforces preservation in non‑edit areas with correction updates that stay aligned with the original sampling dynamics. Experiments show that SR‑Edit delivers better preservation and overall image quality than existing editing techniques.
By Andong Wang, Zehua Chen, Yuxuan Jiang, Jun Zhu
VibeEdit is a new image‑editing tool that lets users draw spatial marks and add brief notes directly on an image to create a canvas instruction. These instructions guide the model to perform tasks such as adding, removing, replacing, or moving objects, as well as modifying attributes, without needing a separate text prompt. The system is trained on 1.55 million annotated edit pairs and uses a layer‑decoupled conditioning approach, achieving higher VLM rubric scores and PSNR on a benchmark that tests target selection among similar objects.
By Jinjing Zhao, Fangyun Wei, Yitong Wang, Xiuyu Wu, Yunuo Chen, Yang Yue, Sirui Zhang, Wenbo Wang, Hongyang Zhang, Dong Chen, Yan Lu, Chang Xu
The paper introduces StruPO, a structure‑aware prompt editor that uses a calibrated scene graph to guide prompt modifications while preserving requested scene attributes. By aligning token edits with graph‑based structural feedback, StruPO learns a reusable editing policy that improves faithfulness and relational fidelity across multiple generation backbones. Experiments on diverse test sets and human studies show consistent gains in image quality and preference, especially for complex relations.
By Wentao Ye, Yali Ye, Zhiqing Xiao, Ru Peng, Xinpeng Ti, Liyao Li, Zhanming Shen, Peng Lu, Jie Zhang, Haobo Wang
arXiv:2606. 14125v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Inversion-based image editing offers flexible and training-free control but still struggles with inversion accuracy and the trade-off between editing fidelity and background preservation.
By Zheyuan Zhan, Hongchen Li, Can Wang, Yinfei Ma, Mingzhen Huang, Ruoshi Bai, Jiawei Chen, Siwei Lyu, Defang Chen
The paper introduces RC‑GRPO‑Editing, a region‑constrained Group Relative Policy Optimization framework for flow‑based image editing. It localizes exploration by decoupling initial noise perturbations to reduce background‑induced reward variance and adds an attention concentration reward to keep cross‑attention focused on the intended editing region. Experiments on CompBench demonstrate consistent gains in instruction adherence within the editing region while better preserving non‑target content.
By Zhuohan Ouyang, Zhe Qian, Wenhuo Cui, Chaoqun Wang
Rubric-CEPR is a self‑evolving image editing framework that improves a pretrained editor using only its own generated samples, without human‑edited targets or external reward models. It employs a planner to generate structured edit instructions, an editor to produce multiple candidate edits, and a frozen critic that scores each candidate with rubric‑augmented contrastive edit‑preservation rewards, rejecting infeasible candidates via non‑compensatory gates. The best verified candidate is distilled into the editor through lightweight adapter training, yielding measurable performance gains on benchmarks such as Qwen‑Image‑Edit, GEdit‑Bench, and Complex‑Edit.
By Ritesh Thawkar, Shubham Patle, Shravan Venkatraman, Rao Muhammad Anwer
arXiv:2510. 08532v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Instruction-based image editing offers a powerful and intuitive way to manipulate images through natural language.
By Rishubh Parihar, Or Patashnik, Daniil Ostashev, R. Venkatesh Babu, Daniel Cohen-Or, Kuan-Chieh Wang
The paper introduces WeGenEditBench, a benchmark with 2,740 evaluation instances and 148 task types for image editing, focusing on local failure detection and prioritization for model improvement. It also presents WeGenEvoStudio, a multi‑agent harness that supports recursive self‑improvement by diagnosing failures, constructing retrieval‑grounded data, and adapting models. Experiments show that models such as GPT‑Image‑2 and Seedream‑5.0‑Pro excel in single‑image and text‑intensive editing, and evolution experiments demonstrate significant targeted gains on selected benchmarks.
By Jun He, Canmiao Fu, Ying Zhang, Zhipeng Huang, Chenyu Mu, Yazhen Xie, Chen Li, Jing Lyu, Weijia Li, Xiang Zhang
arXiv:2606. 05950v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Text-guided image editing has advanced rapidly with diffusion models and unified multimodal foundation models.
By Yuxiao Ye, Haoran He, Fangyuan Kong, Xintao Wang, Pengfei Wan, Kun Gai, Ling Pan
The paper introduces "overpainting," a localized, context-aware image editing technique that allows users to specify precise or loose editing regions via a trimap. The method adapts a pretrained diffusion model with joint attention and low‑rank adaptation, incorporating attention‑dropout to balance noise, source, and mask inputs. An automated pipeline generates training data by pairing images from language‑based editing models, curating them, and extracting trimaps, enabling the model to perform a wide range of editing tasks.
By Sam Sartor, Iliyan Georgiev, Michael Fischer, Valentin Deschaintre, Pieter Peers