arXiv Machine Learning By Roel Visser, Isaac Roberts, Barbara Hammer

Contrastive Concept Importance: Explaining Pairwise Class Decisions Through Automatically Extracted Concept Representations

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 27904v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Concept-based explanations are a prevalent way to explain the decisions of complex black-box methods through semantically meaningful, human-interpretable concepts.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 21

CASE: Contrastive Activation for Class-Sensitive Explanations

The paper introduces a diagnostic test for class sensitivity in saliency methods, revealing that many popular techniques produce nearly identical explanations regardless of the predicted class. This limitation appears across different architectures and datasets, indicating a structural issue. To address this, the authors propose CASE, a contrastive explanation method that isolates features uniquely discriminative for the predicted class, and demonstrate its improved fidelity and class specificity through experiments.

By Dane Williamson, Yangfeng Ji, Matthew Dwyer
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 30

Decoding Affective Nuances: Enhancing MLLMs via Hierarchical Emotion Reasoning and Contrastive Discriminative Pruning

The paper introduces DAN, a training‑free inference‑time framework that improves affective reasoning in multimodal large language models. It combines a Hierarchical Emotional Reasoning Chain (HERC) to better capture fine‑grained visual cues and a Contrastive Discriminative Visual Pruning (CDVP) module to isolate discriminative tokens for semantically similar emotions. Experiments show significant gains, notably a +10.47% improvement on the WebEmo25 benchmark with Qwen3‑VL‑8B‑Instruct.

By Cheng Ye, Weidong Chen, Zhaobo Qi, Beier Zhu, Zhendong Mao
arXiv AI
Oct 26

ACVA-Bench: Beyond Prompt Following in Abstract Concept Visualization Ability for Text-to-Image Models

The paper introduces ACVA-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate text‑to‑image models on their ability to visualize abstract concepts—those without fixed visual referents—across three dimensions: semantic sufficiency, representational diversity, and conceptual distinctiveness. It proposes a fine‑grained visual‑semantic evaluation method that decomposes concept semantics into verifiable questions, bypassing the need for reference images. Benchmark results reveal that current models tend to rely on a limited set of prototypical visual patterns, indicating room for improvement in diversity and distinctiveness.

By Mengyan Wang, Jiyuan An, Yining Liu, YaoWen Zhang, Liner Yang ang Erhong Yang