The paper introduces Self‑Adaptive VLA, a post‑training method that lets Vision‑Language‑Action policies self‑adapt to deployment‑time hardware shifts by using rollouts as context. It creates shift‑conditioned expert demonstrations, compresses visual, proprioceptive, and action data into a latent context token, and modulates the policy via adaptive layer normalization. Experiments on four precision‑critical manipulation tasks show the method recovers over 80 % of the base policy’s performance under actuation bias and encoder offsets, and improves robustness on new workstations.
By Hongxin Zhang, Chunru Lin, Tsun-Hsuan Wang, Zhenjia Xu, Chuang Gan
arXiv:2606. 25800v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Effective online adaptation of vision-language-action (VLA) models remains challenging, as sparse rewards provide weak supervision for high-dimensional autoregressive action policies.
By Kejing Wang, Toan Nguyen, Minh Hoang Nguyen, Simon Khan, Flora D. Salim
arXiv:2610.03476v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Long-horizon mobile manipulation presents significant challenges due to compounding execution errors and capacity interference between locomotion and...
By Chenzhi Liu, Yue Zhang, Jiehong Lin, Jianan Wang, Bo Wang, Zhongrui Wang, Xiaojuan Qi
arXiv:2604. 06435v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Visual Anomaly Detection (VAD) is a critical task for many applications including industrial inspection and healthcare.
By Manuel Barusco, Francesco Borsatti, David Petrovic, Davide Dalle Pezze, Gian Antonio Susto
The paper presents a hardware‑accelerated instance segmentation framework tailored for resource‑constrained lunar robotics, addressing low‑light perception, limited compute, and radiation‑induced hardware faults. It introduces Activation Variance Informative Sampling (AVIS), a label‑free calibration method that selects samples based on activation variance, and deploys a YOLO‑based model on a Deep Learning Processor Unit with architectural tweaks to reduce CPU fallback and ensure bounded latency. A software‑level criticality analysis estimates fault exposure, guiding mitigation that reduces global criticality by 31.7%, while AVIS with bias correction recovers 69.8% of quantization‑induced accuracy loss at 309 ms latency and 5.7 W power consumption.
By Siddhant Shete, Hilmi Dogu K\"uc\"uker, Udo Frese, Frank Kirchner
arXiv:2609.37602v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Robust and reliable perception is essential for autonomous robots operating in real-world environments, particularly in long-term missions where envi...
By Michele Antonazzi, Alejandra C. Hernandez, Jos\'e Araujo, Olov Andersson, Patric Jensfelt