Contextual Candour: Role-Aware Graduated Disclosure for LLMs over Mixed-Sensitivity Contexts
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
Tokenized Key-Gated Adapter Routing (Locket) is a framework that embeds fine‑grained, policy‑driven access control into large language models by training lightweight LoRA adapters for different privacy policies. A gating module associates a learned keyed entry token with a specific adapter, allowing authorized tokens to unlock private knowledge while invalid or missing tokens trigger privacy‑preserving adapters that redact or sanitize sensitive content. Experiments on datasets such as Enron, ECHR, and Yelp with models like Qwen3, Llama‑3.2, and Gemma‑2‑2B show that Locket maintains perplexity comparable to fine‑tuning when the correct token is provided, and significantly reduces PII leakage when the token is absent or invalid, without sacrificing utility.
InferPriv is a new benchmark that evaluates inferential privacy leakage in large language model (LLM) assistants. It measures whether an honest-but-curious recipient can deduce a user’s sensitive attributes from an LLM’s reply during routine tasks, a type of leakage not captured by existing direct‑leakage benchmarks. Testing five frontier models, the study finds that inferential leakage rates (16.2–25.2%) far exceed direct leakage, even when direct leakage is near zero under privacy‑aware prompts.
arXiv:2610.27213v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Personalized large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on profile-conditioned inference, pairing public requests with rich, user-specific facts....
arXiv:2609.14003v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Personal AI agents built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly given access to a user's private data and communications in order to provid...
arXiv:2609.35937v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While prior work has documented privacy failures in LLM agents, it remains unclear how the presentation of privacy guidance influences their choice o...
Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems can expose protected state through internal messages, tool arguments, logs, and persistent memory even when their public outputs appear innocuous. Existing privacy prompts, redaction methods, and source-level access controls restrict surface content or data access, but do not specify what a legitimately informed agent should disclose or how that disclosure may be reused downstream.