arXiv:2603. 26629v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multimodal fusion requires integrating information from multiple sources that may conflict depending on context.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.
arXiv:2608. 07183v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal fusion architectures typically assume all modalities are available at inference, yet sensor failures, acquisition variability, and cost constraints routinely produce incomplete observations.
arXiv:2607. 27289v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The promise of multimodal fusion lies in combining complementary sources of evidence, yet more evidence does not always yield a better prediction.
arXiv:2608. 13108v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-source evidence fusion under Dempster-Shafer theory faces two persistent challenges: existing conflict measures assess inter-evidence inconsistency and intra-evidence uncertainty independently, yielding incomplete evaluations, and current fusion methods evaluate evidence sources exclusively through instantaneous comparisns without exploiting their long-term reliability across diverse decision contexts.
arXiv:2608. 03475v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal intent recognition combines linguistic, acoustic, and visual evidence, but individual modalities may be noisy, missing, semantically conflicting, or disproportionately dominant.
Multimodal learning robust to missing modalities is essential for real-world applications. Existing methods mainly focus on inter-modality missing, where entire modalities are absent, while overlooking intra-modality degradation, where modalities are present but severely corrupted.
arXiv:2607. 20742v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal learning is a robust approach to improve predictive performance in applications such as medical prognosis.