arXiv:2607. 00001v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most approaches to AI alignment treat human preferences as fixed targets to be inferred and optimized.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2607. 14240v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current alignment approaches typically focus on emulating human behavior using static representations of human preferences, failing to capture the dynamic, context-dependent nature of real-world human-AI interactions.
arXiv:2604. 14990v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The prospect of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is increasingly driving institutional decisions, and alignment of AGI is a hard problem.
arXiv:2608. 10327v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Can AI systems be aligned to human values?
arXiv:2605. 01642v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Prevailing alignment methods target a fixed set of preferences and therefore risk forcing value lock-in as societal norms evolve over time.
arXiv:2606. 13755v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We argue that aligning AI to aggregated human preferences is the wrong target.
arXiv:2607. 07021v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Humans continuously coordinate with others in dynamic interactions, often through implicit, hard-to-quantify social norms that act as shared tacit expectations among interacting agents.