arXiv AI
Comparing GenAI to Machine Learning and Manual Review for eDiscovery
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Sep 24
TiAb Review Plugin: A Browser-Based Tool for AI-Assisted Study Selection in Systematic Reviews
arXiv:2604.08602v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Server-based screening tools impose subscription costs, while open-source alternatives require coding skills, and full-text screening has rem...
arXiv AI
Jun 19
Benchmarking Agentic Review Systems
arXiv:2606. 19749v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A new class of agentic review systems are emerging as a remedy to the pressure placed on peer review systems by AI-assisted research, but it is unclear how they should be evaluated.
arXiv AI
Aug 25
LitReview Arena: Evaluating Literature Review Agents with Battle-Style Peer Review Platform
arXiv:2608.21374v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Literature reviews are essential to scientific progress, but rigorously evaluating automatically generated reviews remains difficult because many aspec...
arXiv AI
Sep 15
AppliedScientist: Automated Scientific Revision Through Iterative AI Reviewing
arXiv:2609.14738v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated reviewing systems are increasingly evaluated based on the quality of the reviews they produce. Yet a review is only useful if acting on it le...
arXiv AI
Aug 3
Can AI Evaluate AI Scientists? A Benchmarking Study of Autonomous Research Generation Systems Using Automated Multi-Model Review
arXiv:2607. 28631v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI Scientist systems capable of autonomous research have the potential to significantly accelerate scientific discovery.
arXiv AI
Sep 30
MLToolBench: Learning Tool-Augmented Agents for Machine Learning Development
arXiv:2609.36679v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine learning engineering (MLE) agents have made substantial progress, but learning through ML experimentation remains costly in time and computatio...