arXiv:2608. 14212v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As large language models enter professional domains, they must satisfy domain constraints, include critical evidence, and provide complete reasoning rather than merely produce fluent responses.
By Xukai Wang, Liangqi Li, Zhiyue Xu, Jingang Zhou, Xiaoyu Shi, Jiansheng Cai, Bo Zhang, Zhe Li, Xu-Yao Zhang
The paper proposes a causal prompt engineering framework that encodes a domain expert’s decision logic—termed an Expert Mental Model (EMM)—into large language models (LLMs) to mitigate hallucinations arising from missing knowledge. By formalizing factor formulation, factor monotonization, and monotonicity-preserving hierarchical structuring, the framework reduces the elicitation burden from millions of combinations to a manageable set, enabling a four-step EMM construction algorithm. The approach allows formal measurement of hallucination rates in tacit expert knowledge and is validated in grant proposal evaluation, cybersecurity design, and clinical diagnosis.
By Boris Kovalerchuk, Brent D. Fegley
arXiv:2601.10485v5 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Domain-specific knowledge graphs (DKGs) are critical yet often suffer from limited coverage compared to General Knowledge Graphs (GKGs). Existing t...
By Runhao Zhao, Weixin Zeng, Wentao Zhang, Chong Chen, Zhengpin Li, Xiang Zhao, Lei Chen
arXiv:2606. 20245v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance across a wide range of language-based tasks by leveraging both extensive parametric knowledge and in-context learning ability, enabling them to incorporate external information provided in the input prompt.
By Huang Peng, Jiuyang Tang, Weixin Zeng, Hao Xu, Xiang Zhao
arXiv:2607. 24838v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In medical multiple-choice question answering (MCQA), Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can supplement the domain knowledge of language models (LMs).
By Seongwon Seo, Seung Hwan Cho, Young-Min Kim
The article proposes a framework called quantitative evidence mining to transform biomedical findings into structured, context-rich evidence units. It outlines core elements such as claim, measured entity, value, comparator, population, conditions, temporal context, uncertainty, provenance, validation, and expert review. The authors present an eight-stage reference architecture and emphasize that plausibility should remain multidimensional rather than collapsed into a single truth label, linking extraction to evidence synthesis for applications like clinical trials, biomarker research, and knowledge-graph construction.
By Negin Sadat Babaiha, Stefan Geissler, Marie-Christine Simon, Martin Hofmann-Apitius, Marc Jacobs