MagViT is an interpretable multi‑magnification transformer that classifies breast histopathology images by extracting representations from four BreakHis magnifications (40X, 100X, 200X, 400X) and fusing them with a learnable, scale‑gated mechanism that can mask missing scales. The model selects the most accurate architectural branch at the patient level using five‑fold cross‑validation, achieving high performance on BreakHis (mean image accuracy 0.9191, patient accuracy 0.9643, macro‑F1 0.9042) and demonstrating preliminary cross‑dataset generalization on BUSI and IDC. Grad‑CAM visualizations confirm that the network focuses on diagnostically relevant regions across magnifications.
By Nabil Ashab, Soumit Kumar Kundu, Saif Mahmud Parvez, Shahadat Hossain Sohag, Bidhan Biswas, Nazmus Subha
arXiv:2608. 15019v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Breast mass segmentation is an important step in computer-aided mammography, but it remains difficult because masses can have low contrast, irregular shapes, and boundaries that blend with surrounding breast tissue.
By Alibek Kamiluly, Milana Muratova, Yash Patel, Fan Li
arXiv:2608. 09801v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Joint exam-level prediction and candidate-region localization may improve the usefulness of AI support in mammography.
By Dinh Tan Nguyen, Quang-Hien Kha, Le-Hoang Nguyen, Minh-Toan Dinh, Xuan-Huy Nguyen, Dac Phu Ho, Cao Truong Tran, Sai Ho Ling, Lan T Ho-Pham, Liem Pham, Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le
arXiv:2607. 06309v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Accurate breast cancer classification from mammography requires effective integration of complementary information from craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views, which provide a more complete characterization of breast abnormalities.
By Aysan Ghayouri Pirsoltan, Shima Babakordi, Mohammad Reza Mohammadi
Accurate breast cancer classification from mammography requires effective integration of complementary information from craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views, which provide a more complete characterization of breast abnormalities. However, existing multi-view learning approaches typically rely on feature-level aggregation or single-stage cross-attention, which can entangle view-specific and shared representations and restrict interaction to limited network depths.
This study evaluates the classification accuracy of six modern deep‑learning architectures—VGG19, ResNet50, GoogleNet, ConvNeXt, EfficientNet, and Vision Transformers—on breast ultrasound images categorized by BI‑RADS. Using 2,945 training images and 936 validation images from 1,540 patients, the models were tested in full fine‑tuning, linear evaluation, and training‑from‑scratch settings. The best performance was achieved with full fine‑tuning, yielding 76.39 % accuracy and a 67.94 % F1 score.
By Malitha Gunawardhana, Norbert Zolek