arXiv Machine Learning By Elvin Som\'on, Miguel A. Guti\'errez-Naranjo

Class-Dependent Hybrid Data Augmentation for Multiclass Migraine Classification under Severe Class Imbalance

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2605. 23453v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We conducted a reproducibility-oriented re-evaluation of prior migraine classification studies, correcting for data leakage and metric bias.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 24

When Does Synthetic Data Augmentation Improve Score-Based Imbalanced Classification?

Synthetic data augmentation is widely used to mitigate class imbalance, but its theoretical effects on score-based classification remain poorly understood. This paper develops a framework for characterizing when synthetic minority augmentation can improve threshold-integrated and threshold-optimized metrics, including AUROC, AUPRC, best-threshold balanced accuracy, and best-threshold \(\F_1\) score.

arXiv AI
Jul 21

Data Balancing Strategies: A Systematic Survey of Resampling and Augmentation Methods

arXiv:2505. 13518v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Imbalanced datasets, where one class significantly outnumbers others, remain a persistent challenge in machine learning, often biasing predictions toward the majority class and degrading classifier performance.

By Behnam Yousefimehr, Mehdi Ghatee, Javad Fazli, Shervin Ghaffari, Zahra Rafei, Mohammad Amin Seifi, Sajed Tavakoli, Abolfazl Nikahd, Mahdi Razi Gandomani, Alireza Orouji, Ramtin Mahmoudi Kashani, Sarina Heshmati, Negin Sadat Mousavi
arXiv AI
3d ago

When uncertainty quantification fails: structural vulnerabilities and corrections for selective prediction under clinical class imbalance

The paper investigates how uncertainty quantification fails in selective prediction systems when clinical data exhibit severe class imbalance, leading to systematic exclusion of minority patients. Through experiments on 56 synthetic scenarios and three neurodegenerative disease cohorts, the authors show that standard uncertainty measures become proxies for class membership rather than true ambiguity, and that combining class‑aware correction (CCR) with threshold‑aware metrics restores proper monotonicity and protects minority patients. The study proposes adopting threshold‑aligned uncertainty measures and class‑stratified evaluation to mitigate this bias and improve safety in clinical AI pipelines.

By Walter Endrizzi, Flavio Ragni, Raffaele Marchesi, Stefano Bovo, Monica Moroni, Giuseppe Jurman, Venet Osmani