Choosing a PEFT Variant for Per-Patient Dysarthric ASR: A Single-Speaker Case Study on Two ASR Bases
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The study evaluates seven parameter‑efficient fine‑tuning (PEFT) methods—LoRA, QLoRA, AdaLoRA, DoRA, LoHA, VeRA, and VB‑LoRA—on two ASR back‑ends (Whisper‑large‑v3 and Qwen3‑ASR‑1.7B) for a single post‑stroke Hungarian male speaker with severe dysarthria. Attention‑projection adapters consistently lower character error rates (CER) on both models, with LoRA emerging as the simplest and most effective choice; QLoRA performs worse and offers no memory advantage at this scale. Full fine‑tuning yields the lowest CER, but a 115 MB LoRA that also adapts feed‑forward blocks achieves comparable accuracy with only 3.7 % of the per‑patient storage, and a 5‑minute enrollment audio captures nearly half of the zero‑shot‑to‑30‑minute CER improvement. whyItMatters":"The paper demonstrates that lightweight PEFT adapters can substantially improve dysarthric ASR performance while keeping storage and computational costs low, offering a practical path for personalized speech recognition in clinical settings."
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.