arXiv:2608. 01885v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While deep learning models have achieved state-of-the-art performance in time series anomaly detection, their complex architectures incur substantial inference overhead.
By Zemin Chao, Qianhui Xu, Jianhe Cen, Guangzhi Ge, Xiao Chen, Hoangzhi Wang
arXiv:2508. 00909v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Time series anomaly detection plays a critical role in a wide range of real-world applications.
By Aitor S\'anchez-Ferrera, Usue Mori, Borja Calvo, Jose A. Lozano
arXiv:2602. 01359v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Although recent studies on time-series anomaly detection have increasingly adopted ever-larger neural network architectures such as transformers and foundation models, they incur high computational costs and memory usage, making them impractical for real-time and resource-constrained scenarios.
By Jinju Park, Seokho Kang
arXiv:2509. 18751v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recently reconstruction-based deep models have been widely used for time series anomaly detection, but as their capacity and generalization capability increase, these models tend to over-generalize, often reconstructing unseen anomalies accurately.
By Samuel Yoon, Jongwon Kim, Juyoung Ha, Young Myoung Ko
arXiv:2609.39489v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Sample-level reliability heterogeneity is common in deep time series learning. Standard training pipelines apply a uniform regularization setting to al...
By Siru Zhong, Senzhang Wang, James T. Kwok, Yuxuan Liang
arXiv:2507. 15584v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Despite the continuous proposal of new anomaly detection algorithms and extensive benchmarking efforts, progress seems to stagnate, with only minor performance differences between established baselines and new algorithms.
By Philipp R\"ochner, Simon Kl\"uttermann, Kevin Kammler, Franz Rothlauf, Emmanuel M\"uller, Daniel Schl\"or