arXiv:2609.36968v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Unsupervised tabular anomaly detection (TAD) aims to identify anomalous rows in tabular data using normal training samples. While conventional methods...
By Doyun Choi, Dooho Lee, Jaemin Yoo
arXiv:2606. 28970v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Unsupervised tabular anomaly detection requires methods that are accurate, robust across heterogeneous datasets, and computationally efficient.
By Quanling Zhao, Jiaying Yang, Ye Tian, Josh Victoria, Zhijun Wang, Pietro Mercati, Onat Gungor, Tajana Rosing
arXiv:2610.23765v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Weakly supervised anomaly detection on tabular data is an essential task in many label-scarce applications, since tabular data is widely encountered an...
By Siyu Zhou, Yuqin Xie, Hao Yuan, Yingjie Zhou
The paper studies a class of tabular anomaly detectors that train a neural map toward a fixed target using squared‑error loss, noting that improved optimization can paradoxically worsen detection performance—a phenomenon termed convergence collapse. It demonstrates that this collapse arises because the learned map extrapolates beyond the training data, erasing residual signals on anomalies. To address this, the authors introduce Kernel Contraction Matching (KCM), a closed‑form, training‑free kernel‑based baseline, and propose the Kernel‑Anchored Regularizer (KAR), which penalizes deviations from a kernel‑weighted average of training targets, thereby mitigating collapse and improving AUROC during extended training.
By Jos\'e Lucas De Melo Costa, Fabrice Popineau, Arpad Rimmel, Bich-Li\^en Doan
arXiv:2608. 19463v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Anomaly detection in tabular data is challenging because abnormal samples often arise as violations of cross-feature dependencies rather than simple marginal deviations.
By Tu Anh Hoang Nguyen, Dang Nguyen, Thuc Duy Le, Trung Le, Sunil Gupta
arXiv:2607. 23924v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision foundation models have enabled strong training-free anomaly detection (AD).
By Jyun-Ze Tang, Po-Han Huang, Ming-Ching Chang, Chih-Fan Hsu, Jeng-Lin Li
arXiv:2606. 11844v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continual anomaly detection in tabular data is challenging and remains largely underexplored, particularly in settings with heterogeneous feature schemas, distribution shifts, and severe class imbalance.
By Dayananda Herurkar, Federico Raue, Joachim Folz, J\"orn Hees, Andreas Dengel
Vision foundation models have enabled strong training-free anomaly detection (AD). However, most existing approaches rely primarily on independent local patch features, leaving the global contextual information encoded by Vision Transformers (ViTs) underexploited.
arXiv:2507. 15584v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Despite the continuous proposal of new anomaly detection algorithms and extensive benchmarking efforts, progress seems to stagnate, with only minor performance differences between established baselines and new algorithms.
By Philipp R\"ochner, Simon Kl\"uttermann, Kevin Kammler, Franz Rothlauf, Emmanuel M\"uller, Daniel Schl\"or
The paper introduces a training‑free anomaly detector that simultaneously handles structural and logical defects by calibrating heterogeneous anomaly cues with statistics from normal images. This calibration aligns frozen representations, allowing their fusion without extra training or part‑level supervision. The resulting method achieves state‑of‑the‑art AUROC scores on MVTec‑LOCO and remains competitive on MVTec‑AD.
By Changyi Li, Miao Yu, Kai Dong, Yu Xiao
arXiv:2608. 01885v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While deep learning models have achieved state-of-the-art performance in time series anomaly detection, their complex architectures incur substantial inference overhead.
By Zemin Chao, Qianhui Xu, Jianhe Cen, Guangzhi Ge, Xiao Chen, Hoangzhi Wang
While deep learning models have achieved state-of-the-art performance in time series anomaly detection, their complex architectures incur substantial inference overhead. Existing methods typically apply a uniform inference strategy across all data points, which is inefficient given that anomalies are inherently scarce and the vast majority of temporal data consists of predictable normal patterns.