arXiv Computer Vision By Eleonora Ristori, Luca Bindini, Marco Lippi, Paolo Frasconi

Can We Use Saliency Maps for the Evaluation of Generative Image Models?

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

The paper proposes a new evaluation framework for generative image models that uses a generator‑specific classifier trained to distinguish real images from those produced by a particular model. By analyzing the classifier’s decisions with saliency maps, the authors show that the maps reveal model‑specific artifacts rather than a universal notion of fakeness, and that combining classification accuracy with saliency information yields a composite score that aligns with human judgments. This approach avoids reliance on large pretrained backbones and works solely with real and generated samples from the evaluated model.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computer Vision.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 28

Amplify What You Gaze At: Target Saliency Boosting in Text-to-Image Generation

The paper introduces Target Saliency Boosting, a new task that enhances the visual prominence of a specific object in text-to-image generation without visual priors. It proposes GazeME, a lightweight framework that inserts learnable marker tokens around object descriptions to indicate which objects to emphasize or suppress. By building a saliency-semantics dataset and using Saliency Prior Marker Activation, GazeME learns to adjust markers during training and automatically applies them at inference, effectively boosting target saliency while maintaining semantic alignment and image quality.

By Shengqi Dang, Zhengxi Yu, Feilin Han, Xingyu Lan, Nan Cao
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 9

Relative Patch Response Learning for Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection

The paper introduces Relative Patch Response Learning (PRL) to detect AI‑generated images by comparing patch responses across two mixed views of aligned real‑generated image pairs. PRL uses a relative response objective, a reference coherence objective, and an area ranking objective to address contextual shifts caused by self‑attention, providing precise supervision for patch‑level detection. Experiments show PRL outperforms prior methods by 4.3% and 5.9% in average balanced accuracy on standard and in‑the‑wild benchmarks.

By Tianyu Wang, Ouxiang Li, Yanbin Hao, Zhenhua Tang, Shuo Wang