arXiv:2608. 04783v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into software engineering has shifted the focus from function-level generation to repository-scale assistance.
By Yuexi Yang, Alyssa Wu, Ji Luo, Richeng Xuan, Zhichao Hu, Yuhong Liu, Zhen Qin
arXiv:2606. 29520v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as assistants across the software development lifecycle, yet their ability to reason about software architecture remains largely unmeasured.
By Tiziano Santilli, Francesco Daghero, Mayhar Tourchi Moghaddam
arXiv:2606. 14948v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLMs have substantially improved software engineering yet real-world development requires architectural understanding.
By Kirill Vasilevski (Justina), Ximing Dong (Justina), Benjamin Rombaut (Justina), Ruochen Deng (Justina), Jiahuei Lin (Justina), Arthur Leung, Dayi Lin, Boyuan Chen, Shaowei Wang, Ahmed E. Hassan
arXiv:2605.01392v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential across software engineering tasks, including soft...
By Yifei Wang, Ruiyin Li, Peng Liang, Yangxiao Cai, Zengyang Li, Mojtaba Shahin, Arif Ali Khan, Qiong Feng
arXiv:2507. 16395v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Atomic commits, which address a single development concern, are a best practice in software development.
By Bo Hou, Xin Tan, Kai Zheng, Fang Liu, Yinghao Zhu, Li Zhang
The paper introduces GADR, a multi‑agent, self‑correcting workflow that extracts architectural decisions from raw meeting transcriptions and produces Nygard‑formatted ADR drafts. A feasibility study using five real project transcripts, expert reviews by four senior architects, and evaluations by fifteen students shows that GADR captures most expert‑identified decisions and yields drafts that participants find clear and useful, outperforming zero‑shot and few‑shot baselines in stability and structural adherence. The study also highlights a trade‑off: RAG‑based enrichment can deepen ADR content but may introduce transcript‑unfaithful material, raising open questions about traceability in automated architectural documentation.
By Lucas Daniel Costa da Silva, Kiev Gama