arXiv AI By Maroof Kousar, Jinsung Han, Mohit Chandra, Munmun De Choudhury, Yibo Hu

Can I Take Another Dose? DoseBench: Evaluating LLM Decision-Making in OTC Dosing QA

Read the original on arXiv AI →

DoseBench is a new benchmark consisting of 230 consumer‑style questions about whether a person can safely take another dose of acetaminophen or ibuprofen. The study evaluates eight large language models, finding that overall accuracy ranges from 44.8 % to 62.2 %, but models with similar accuracy can make vastly different dosing decisions, with some incorrectly approving up to 60.5 % of prohibited doses. The authors show that providing more guidance or drug facts can improve accuracy but may also cause models to overlook missing information, underscoring the difficulty of applying safety rules correctly in health QA.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 3

FDARxBench: Benchmarking Regulatory and Clinical Reasoning on FDA Generic Drug Assessment

FDARxBench is an expert‑curated benchmark designed to evaluate document‑grounded question answering on FDA drug label documents, focusing on generic drug assessment. It features a multi‑stage pipeline that generates high‑quality QA examples covering factual, multi‑hop, and refusal tasks, and includes protocols for both open‑book and closed‑book reasoning. Experiments with various language models show significant gaps in factual grounding, long‑context retrieval, and safe refusal behavior, highlighting the challenge of regulatory‑grade label comprehension.

By Betty Xiong, Jillian Fisher, Benjamin Newman, Meng Hu, Shivangi Gupta, Yejin Choi, Lanyan Fang, Russ B Altman
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 3

HarmReduction: Benchmarking LLMs in Harm Reduction Information Provision to Support People Who Use Drugs

The paper introduces HarmReduction, a benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on their ability to provide accurate and safe harm reduction information to people who use drugs (PWUD). The benchmark, HR-Basic, contains 2,160 question‑answer‑evidence pairs covering safety boundary checks, quantitative value provision, and polysubstance risk inference. Experiments show that even state‑of‑the‑art LLMs struggle with accuracy and can pose severe safety risks, underscoring the need for a dedicated evaluation framework.

By Kaixuan Wang, Chenxin Diao, Jason T. Jacques, Zhongliang Guo, Shuai Zhao
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

Predicting Quantifiability from Primary Screens to Prioritize Dose-Response Profiling

The paper introduces a framework to predict whether a compound’s potency can be quantified in dose‑response profiling, treating quantifiability as a separate triage goal from biological activity. It shows that features from low‑cost primary screens, rather than molecular structure, strongly predict quantifiability, and that this prediction holds across new chemical scaffolds and assay families. The authors argue that incorporating quantifiability predictions can better allocate expensive dose‑response resources.

By Sean Lim