arXiv:2607. 13078v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLMs are now proposed for fraud detection, scam investigation, content moderation, and other trust-and-safety workflows.
By Keyur Gabani
LLMs are now proposed for fraud detection, scam investigation, content moderation, and other trust-and-safety workflows. Much of the public literature still evaluates them as models, with less attention to their behavior as components in operational pipelines.
arXiv:2608. 08577v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fraud operations must allocate events among automatic approval, analyst review, and automatic blocking even though the labels needed to evaluate these actions are selective and delayed.
By Jie Deng (Tongji University, Shanghai, China)
The paper introduces the Agentic Commerce Bench (ACB), a benchmark for measuring fraud in AI agents that autonomously spend money. It presents a taxonomy of agentic commerce fraud, a dataset of twenty fraud classes derived from real production data, and an open‑source detector stack called gordonguard for auditing and replaying hostile counterparties. The study shows that current reasoning layers and security scanners perform poorly on many classes, highlighting the need for better detection mechanisms.
By Ankit Srivastava, Debjyoti Paul
The paper introduces DISCERN, a two-tier protocol for certifying that updates to production models do not increase risk. It first uses unlabeled data to detect benign updates based on disagreement rates, then selectively labels only disagreements through an anytime-valid confidence sequence. The method achieves finite-sample validity with label-complexity bounds of order ρ²/ε², demonstrating significant label savings and strong empirical performance across 14,000+ audit streams.
By Vishnu Bindu Balachandran
The paper presents a deployed system that scores blockchain addresses using their position in a massive multi‑chain transaction graph instead of relying on sanctions lists. The system operates on a single graph of 835 million addresses and 15.8 billion edges across five EVM chains, employing a shared inductive encoder with per‑chain normalization and two scoring heads. It demonstrates label‑free transfer, achieving high recall on held‑out positives for Base, Arbitrum, and Gnosis at a very low alert rate, and shows significant lead time over external registry events, while maintaining fast, reproducible serving performance.
By Yury Korolev