arXiv:2607. 13078v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLMs are now proposed for fraud detection, scam investigation, content moderation, and other trust-and-safety workflows.
LLMs are now proposed for fraud detection, scam investigation, content moderation, and other trust-and-safety workflows. Much of the public literature still evaluates them as models, with less attention to their behavior as components in operational pipelines.
arXiv:2606. 04990v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based agents increasingly solve complex tasks by interacting with external tools, retrieval systems, memory modules, environments, and other agents.
arXiv:2609.15015v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Synthetic perturbations appear to offer inexpensive calibration data for LLM evaluators in biomedical ML, where expert review is scarce. Yet a planted...
arXiv:2607. 19449v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Evaluation frameworks for tool-augmented LLM agents focus overwhelmingly on capability metrics or explicit tool crashes, leaving silent infrastructure failures and HTTP 200 responses with empty, null, or malformed payloads largely unaudited.
arXiv:2607. 17883v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Enterprises will not deploy AI agents they cannot trust, and the most-cited reason for distrust is hallucination: confident, fluent output that is simply not true.
arXiv:2604. 19755v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Anti-money laundering (AML) transaction monitoring generates large volumes of alerts that must be rapidly triaged by investigators under strict audit and governance constraints.
arXiv:2608. 05235v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Research agents increasingly conduct multi-round machine-learning experiments in industrial recommendation settings and retain the resulting trajectories to guide later decisions.
arXiv:2606. 18021v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI systems deployed in legal workflows hallucinate at rates that aggregate metrics report at ~52%, but this average conceals where errors concentrate and in which direction they run, leaving compliance officers without an actionable signal for trustworthy deployment.
arXiv:2510. 08948v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Effective e-commerce risk management requires in-depth case investigations to identify emerging fraud patterns in highly adversarial environments.
arXiv:2606. 19887v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing safety benchmarks target general adversarial scenarios but miss finance-specific risks.
The paper presents a systematic framework for large language model (LLM) watermarking as a provenance tool in big data ecosystems. It categorizes existing watermarking methods along four deployment dimensions—insertion point, verification authority, operational state, and transformation threat model—and aligns them with the big data principles of Volume, Velocity, Variety, Veracity, and Value. The authors introduce a readiness framework that maps four key workloads—online generation, streaming detection, transformation pipelines, and ecosystem governance—to system-level requirements such as throughput, false-positive control, robustness, cross-domain reliability, governance, and downstream utility, while highlighting gaps between benchmark performance and real-world deployment readiness.
arXiv:2607. 19266v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fraud detection systems must scale with rising transaction volume while remaining explainable and reviewable.