arXiv Machine Learning
BioDCASE: Active Learning for Bioacoustics
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 8
Determinantal point process sampling for bioacoustic active learning
arXiv:2607. 06063v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Eco-acoustic monitoring generates vast volumes of audio data, making active learning a promising approach for reducing annotation effort while efficiently training reliable biodiversity classifiers.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24
Active Learning for Biodiversity Monitoring: From Label Efficiency to Reliable Ecological Inference
The paper discusses how active learning (AL) can alleviate the expert annotation bottleneck in biodiversity monitoring by selecting the most informative samples under a fixed budget. It highlights that while AL reduces labeling effort, its non-random sample selection complicates model validation, calibration, and ecological inference, issues often overlooked in current studies. The authors review existing AL research across acoustic and image data, identify gaps such as limited species coverage and lack of real-world deployments, and propose a tutorial framework and roadmap for developing AL methods that support efficient training, reliable validation, and trustworthy ecological conclusions.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 16
MetaPerch: Learning from metadata for bioacoustics foundation models
arXiv:2607. 14072v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Bioacoustic foundation models rely on large-scale citizen science platforms like Xeno-Canto for geographically and ecologically diverse data.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23
Targeted Review for AI-Assisted Biodiversity Surveys: Active Continuous-Score Occupancy Modeling
The paper introduces ACORN, a method that blends machine‑learning predictions with occupancy models to guide ecologists in selecting which samples to review. By strategically choosing the most informative labels, ACORN achieves ecological conclusions nearly identical to fully human‑labeled data while dramatically reducing the number of expert reviews needed. The approach is evaluated on camera‑trap and bioacoustic datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness across real‑world biodiversity surveys.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 3
Finding Needles in the Haystack: Transductive Active Labeling in Ecology
arXiv:2606. 03821v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Active learning is now standard practice in labeling ecological data, enabling ecologists to quickly process large volumes of field data to understand and monitor natural environments.
arXiv AI
Jun 12
GetNetUPAM: Ecologically Informed Nested Cross-Validation and Noise-Robust Attention for Marine Bioacoustic Monitoring
arXiv:2509. 04682v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deploying reliable bioacoustic monitoring systems requires models that generalize under high-noise, low-SNR conditions and evaluation protocols that expose deployment-relevant failure modes, gaps largely unaddressed in current UPAM practice.