arXiv AI By Marta Colmenar Herrera, Pablo M\'arquez Neila, \c{S}erife Seda Kucur Erg\"unay, Martin S. Zinkernagel, Raphael Sznitman

Beyond Point Estimates for Glaucoma Visual Field Forecasting with Diffusion Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 30417v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Forecasting visual fields (VFs) is critical for personalized monitoring and treatment planning in glaucoma.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 25

Deep learning of longitudinal visual fields predicts glaucoma progression rate and identifies fast progressors

Deep learning framework GLAM predicts glaucoma progression rates from longitudinal Humphrey 24‑2 visual field data and five clinical features, achieving a mean absolute error of 0.139 dB yr⁻¹ and an AUC of 0.990 for fast‑progressor detection. Using attention‑based fusion and aleatoric uncertainty, GLAM outperforms a ridge regression baseline by 73.5% in MD‑rate prediction. The model demonstrates that visual field data alone can match multimodal pipelines for progression prognostication.

By Taiabur Rahman, Siddiqur Rahman, Muhammad Moniruzzaman, Ummay Kawsar, Sayedatunnessa Ratna, Shadman Siddique, Rafsan Siddique, Tausif Ahmad, Tahsin Ahmad, Golam Rabbani
arXiv AI
Sep 21

Diagnostic-Guided Longitudinal Modeling for Forecasting Retinal Atrophy Progression

The study proposes a diagnostic-guided approach to choose between stochastic and deterministic longitudinal imaging models based on whether inter-visit changes are driven by disease progression or acquisition variability. Applied to a large, heterogeneous Optos fundus autofluorescence archive, the diagnostic revealed weak time-dependent changes and limited benefit from stochastic models, leading to the development of the deterministic Temporal Retinal U‑Net (TRU). TRU outperformed other classical and deep‑learning comparators on image‑level and eye‑specific progression metrics across held‑out and independent zero‑shot transfer cohorts, though with slightly lower precision in a smaller cross‑vendor cohort.

By Liyin Chen, Souvick Mukherjee, Ines Maria De Carvalho Lains, Nazlee Zebardast, Mengyu Wang, Tobias Elze, Jason I. Comander
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 25

Ordinal Diffusion Models for Color Fundus Images

The paper introduces an ordinal latent diffusion model for generating color fundus images that incorporates the ordered structure of diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity, using a scalar disease representation instead of categorical conditioning. Evaluations on the EyePACS dataset show improved visual realism, with reduced Fréchet inception distance for most stages and a higher quadratic weighted κ from 0.79 to 0.87. Interpolation experiments demonstrate the model captures a continuous spectrum of disease progression derived from coarse, ordered labels.

By Gustav Schmidt, Philipp Berens, Sarah M\"uller
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 1

Uncertainty of Vision Medical Foundation Models

The paper investigates how pre‑training strategy, dataset size, and domain affect uncertainty estimation in vision medical foundation models. It compares point‑prediction calibration with conformal (region) prediction across retinal, histopathological, and chest X‑ray models, finding that domain‑specific, self‑supervised pre‑training yields better calibration and more efficient conformal sets. The study shows that standard recalibration alone cannot fully reconcile uncertainty differences between models trained on different data sources.

By Haoxu Huang, Narges Razavian