arXiv:2510. 22170v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Persona conditioning is widely used to steer large language model (LLM) behavior, but it is unclear whether it induces stable behavioral structure or superficial variation.
By Alexandra Yost, Shreyans Jain, Shivam Raval, Grant Corser, Allen Roush, Nina Xu, Jacqueline Hammack, Ravid Shwartz-Ziv, Amirali Abdullah
The paper examines whether fine‑tuning large language models (LLMs) with personality‑labelled data improves their ability to act as socially interactive agents. Two small open‑weight LLMs were fine‑tuned on a corpus of personality‑labelled social media posts and dialogues, and the resulting models were evaluated in various social interaction scenarios by independent LLM judges. The findings show that the fine‑tuned models do not outperform their baseline counterparts in role‑playing personalities, though they offer comparable text quality and increased linguistic diversity for the Qwen models; low inter‑rater agreement limits confidence in the results, suggesting future work should focus on training data quality and domain alignment.
By Tim Krabbe, Xiaodan Shi
arXiv:2402.14879v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: To enhance immersion and engagement in video games, the design of Affective Non-Player Characters (ANPCs) is a key focus for researchers and...
By Lawrence J. Klinkert, Stephanie Buongiorno, Corey Clark
arXiv:2605.29791v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) can convincingly simulate personas in explicit self-reports, they often deviate in implicit behavioral decisions...
By Yutong Yang, Chenxi Miao, Weikang Li, Yunfang Wu
arXiv:2412.12144v5 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Personality assessment through situational judgment tests (SJTs) offers unique advantages over traditional Likert-type self-report scales, ye...
By Chang-Jin Li, Jiyuan Zhang, Yun Tang, Jian Li
The paper investigates whether human psychometric questionnaires can reliably characterize large language models (LLMs) in everyday interactions. By comparing eight open‑source LLMs’ value and personality profiles from Likert self‑reports (PVQ‑40/21 and BFI‑44/10) with generation probabilities on value‑laden user queries, the authors find substantial divergence between the two methods. The study shows that questionnaire items contain explicit lexical cues that lead models to respond in socially desirable ways, whereas realistic user queries lack such cues, and demographic persona prompts shift questionnaire responses but not generation outputs, indicating that questionnaire scores overestimate LLMs’ true behavioral tendencies.
By Woojung Song, Dongmin Choi, Yoonah Park, Jongwook Han, Eun-Ju Lee, Yohan Jo