arXiv:2609.38603v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: While earth observation models have advanced substantially, they still lack interpretability. While concept-bottleneck models provide interpretability...
By Rishabh Mondal, Nipun Batra, Utkarsh Mall
arXiv:2609.36648v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language pre-training has reshaped image clustering, giving rise to language-assisted image clustering (LaIC), which leverages textual semantics...
By Yuanwei Hu, Bo Peng, Yuheng Jia, Xinting Hu, Yadan Luo, Wenjie Zhu
The paper reviews domain generalization (DG) for object detection, highlighting its scarcity and unique challenges such as localization and multi-scale representation. It examines synthetic data from three angles: as an enabler that diversifies and aligns training data, as a probe that allows controlled experiments to uncover failure modes, and as a source of a synthetic‑to‑real gap that hampers deployment on real imagery. The authors conclude that future DG research must develop representation‑aware methods that explicitly address both localization and classification under domain shift.
By Elfi I. S. Hofmeijer, Ella P. Fokkinga, Friso G. Heslinga, Klamer Schutte, J\"orgen M. Karlholm
The paper evaluates out‑of‑the‑box object detection models for automatic target detection and recognition (ATD/R) in military settings. Six YOLO variants and two DETR variants were benchmarked on a new military dataset featuring vehicles, occlusions, and small targets, with performance measured in mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 across air‑to‑ground and ground‑to‑ground perspectives. Findings show larger models and DETR-based approaches perform best, fine‑tuning on the VisDrone dataset improves air‑to‑ground and small‑object performance, yet all models still struggle with small targets in air‑to‑ground scenarios.
By Alma M. Liezenga, Lotte Nijskens, Henrik R. Baumann, Stefan Becker, Simon Bensberg, Niccol\`o Camarlinghi, H{\aa}vard R. Eiring, Alexander W. Johnsgaard, Tanel Liiv, Giuseppe Martino, Matteo Marturini, Matthias Rapp, Jan Erik van Woerden, Alexander Wolpert, Hugo J. Kuijf
DiaVLo is a diagnostic framework for vision‑language models (VLMs) that uses human curation and VLM generation to create specifications of desired and observed behaviours, revealing potential misalignments. It also offers causal estimates to pinpoint the most influential concepts driving VLM behaviour. Experiments on several open‑source VLMs under classification and generation tasks show that DiaVLo’s behaviour labels correlate with model performance and illuminate how VLMs perceive, organise, and prioritise concepts.
By Lorenzo Corti, Jie Yang
arXiv:2610.29241v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: In this paper, we investigate why vision-language models (VLMs) produce errors by decomposing them into two sources: visual-representation failures, in...
By Anat Veikherman, Mor Ventura, Nitay Calderon, Lihi Zelnik-Manor, Roi Reichart