arXiv:2602. 02888v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Hallucinations remain a major obstacle for large language models (LLMs), especially in safety-critical domains.
arXiv:2606. 07528v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hallucination in large language models (LLMs), defined as the generation of factually incorrect or unsupported content, remains a critical barrier to reliable deployment.
arXiv:2606. 06959v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hallucination detection is essential for the reliable deployment of large language models (LLMs).
The paper proposes a hidden‑state probing method for detecting hallucinations at the span level in large language model outputs, moving beyond token‑wise binary classification. By examining layer‑wise activation patterns, the approach identifies the exact onset and continuation tokens of hallucinations, achieving higher precision‑recall AUC than random baselines despite class imbalance. Additionally, the authors introduce a cross‑model detection framework where one model observes another’s internal representations, showing that an external observer can match or surpass the generator’s own self‑detection of hallucination onsets, even when the observer is smaller.
arXiv:2608. 10835v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) achieve impressive visual reasoning and dialogue capabilities, yet frequently hallucinate content unsupported by the visual input.
arXiv:2606. 29809v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hallucination detection has become a pressing requirement for trustworthy AI deployment at scale.
arXiv:2606. 00819v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance across diverse natural language tasks, yet their outputs often suffer from hallucinations -- content that is misaligned with factual information.
arXiv:2608. 16353v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Even well-aligned large language models confidently generate factually incorrect text, making hallucination a persistent reliability risk in high-stakes deployments.
arXiv:2605. 26366v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent studies on hallucination detection have shown that hallucination-related signals are more strongly encoded in intermediate layers than in the final layer of large language models (LLMs).
The paper introduces InnerExpert, a method that uses Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) internal signals—such as router entropy, expert disagreement, and usage patterns—to detect hallucinations at the token level in large language models. By combining these MoE-specific signals with standard transformer features into compact per-token vectors, InnerExpert trains a lightweight detector using an LLM-as-a-judge pipeline, enabling continuous updates without manual labeling. Experiments across five datasets and two MoE architectures show that InnerExpert outperforms existing methods, achieving up to 0.91 answer-level and 0.76 token-level AUROC with only a single forward pass.
The paper introduces a multi‑signal pipeline for detecting hallucinations in large language model outputs, combining fine‑tuned DeBERTa‑v3 classification, Monte Carlo Dropout uncertainty, and temperature‑scaled calibration. On the HaluEval benchmark it achieves strong performance (F1 = 0.915, AUROC = 0.977) and further improves accuracy to 93.2% with MC Dropout. The authors also demonstrate that applying Direct Preference Optimization to a Qwen2.5‑0.5B generator reduces hallucination rates from 85.5% to 37.7%, and show that domain‑specific fine‑tuning (PubMedBERT on SciFact) yields better results than general‑domain training.
The paper introduces InnerExpert, a method that uses Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture signals—such as router entropy, expert disagreement, and usage patterns—to detect hallucinations at the token level in Large Language Models. By combining these MoE-specific signals with standard transformer features into compact per-token vectors, InnerExpert trains a lightweight detector using an LLM-as-a-judge pipeline, enabling continuous updates without manual labeling. Experiments across five datasets and two MoE architectures show that InnerExpert outperforms existing methods, achieving up to 0.91 answer-level and 0.76 token-level AUROC with only a single forward pass.
The paper introduces a multi‑signal pipeline for detecting hallucinations in large language models, combining fine‑tuned DeBERTa‑v3 classification, Monte Carlo Dropout uncertainty, and temperature‑scaled calibration. On the HaluEval benchmark it achieves high performance (F1 = 0.915, AUROC = 0.977) across QA, summarization, and dialogue, and shows that 25 % of training data yields 77 % of full‑data performance. The authors also demonstrate that applying Direct Preference Optimization to a Qwen2.5‑0.5B generator cuts hallucination rates from 85.5 % to 37.7 %, and that domain‑specific fine‑tuning (PubMedBERT on SciFact) outperforms general‑domain models for biomedical text.