arXiv AI By Ashwin Nedungadi, Stefan Oehmcke, Stefan L\"udtke

Autoregressive Mosaics: Probing 2D Spatial Reasoning in Text-Only Language Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 19

Encoded but Not Actionable: Auditing the Decode-Generate-Steer Gap in Frozen LLMs for Geometric Constraints

The paper audits frozen decoder‑only large language models (LLMs) on geometric reasoning tasks using parametric CAD constraints. It probes hidden states for linear decodability, forced‑choice generation, activation‑level influence, and behavioral steerability, finding that pretraining improves decoding of local geometric relations but not sketch‑level DOF status. The study shows that decodable information is not always actionable: generation often fails to express it, and steering interventions do not reliably control outputs, revealing divergences among decodability, generation, activation influence, and steerability.

By Man Liang, Xinzhao Cheng, Faizan Wajid
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 21

From Abstraction to Action: DSLs for Natural Language Abstraction Interpretation and Execution

The paper introduces domain-specific languages (DSLs) as an explicit representation layer to bridge the gap between high-level natural-language abstractions and concrete actions. Experiments on the visually-grounded “Hexagons” task and the “Text2CAD” benchmark show that code generation using a human-curated DSL yields dramatic performance gains, especially at higher abstraction levels, while automatically induced DSLs only partially recover these gains. The study highlights that the right representation can close much of the performance gap caused by abstraction, but that automatically learning such representations remains a challenge.

By Amit Lisha, Reut Tsarfaty
arXiv AI
Jun 4

From Symbolic to Geometric: Enabling Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models

arXiv:2606. 04381v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent large language models (LLMs) often appear to exhibit spatial reasoning ability; however, this capability is largely \emph{symbolic}, arising from pattern matching over spatial language rather than true \emph{geometric} reasoning over space.

By Chen Chu, Bita Azarijoo, Li Xiong, Khurram Shafique, Cyrus Shahabi
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 3

From Symbolic to Geometric: Enabling Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models

Recent large language models (LLMs) often appear to exhibit spatial reasoning ability; however, this capability is largely \emph{symbolic}, arising from pattern matching over spatial language rather than true \emph{geometric} reasoning over space. Because LLMs operate on discrete tokens, they lack native support for continuous spatial representations, explicit geometric computation, and structured spatial operators.