The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
arXiv:2608.30751v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) trained only on text and code can sometimes generate programs that draw recognizable images. However, it is unclear whethe...
arXiv:2606. 04381v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent large language models (LLMs) often appear to exhibit spatial reasoning ability; however, this capability is largely \emph{symbolic}, arising from pattern matching over spatial language rather than true \emph{geometric} reasoning over space.
Recent large language models (LLMs) often appear to exhibit spatial reasoning ability; however, this capability is largely \emph{symbolic}, arising from pattern matching over spatial language rather than true \emph{geometric} reasoning over space. Because LLMs operate on discrete tokens, they lack native support for continuous spatial representations, explicit geometric computation, and structured spatial operators.
The paper audits frozen decoder‑only large language models (LLMs) on geometric reasoning tasks using parametric CAD constraints. It probes hidden states for linear decodability, forced‑choice generation, activation‑level influence, and behavioral steerability, finding that pretraining improves decoding of local geometric relations but not sketch‑level DOF status. The study shows that decodable information is not always actionable: generation often fails to express it, and steering interventions do not reliably control outputs, revealing divergences among decodability, generation, activation influence, and steerability.
arXiv:2608.22390v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong potential in graphical user interface (GUI) generation, but reliable evaluation remains challengi...
arXiv:2511. 09483v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While multimodal large language models can describe visual content, their ability to generate executable procedures remains underexplored.