arXiv AI By Ciprian Cristescu, Adrian-Marius Dumitran, Angela-Liliana Dumitran, Gabriel Stefan

Automated Textbook Auditing with Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 11276v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ensuring the quality of educational materials requires more than standard proofreading: textbooks must be audited for factual accuracy, domain-specific technical correctness, and linguistic quality simultaneously -- a task that general-purpose grammar checkers cannot address.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 6

Benchmarking and Enhancing LLMs for Rule-Intensive Review of National Standard Documents

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly support complex professional tasks, yet their capabilities in rule-intensive document review remain insufficiently evaluated. National standard documents, such as China GB/T standards, offer a representative testbed: they are lengthy, highly structured, and governed by explicit rules for scope, terminology, normative wording, and cross-section consistency.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Limits of LLM Text Detectors in Education

The paper "Limits of LLM Text Detectors in Education" argues that existing LLM‑generated text detectors assume a binary human/LLM distinction, which fails to capture realistic student‑AI collaboration. It introduces a contribution‑aware evaluation framework with eight student contribution levels and presents GEDE, a benchmark of over 900 human‑written and 12,500 generated essays across 886 tasks. Using GEDE, the authors evaluate four detection methods and find that most detectors perform poorly on intermediate contribution levels, especially LLM‑assisted revisions, raising concerns about false accusations.

By Lukas Gehring, Benjamin Paa{\ss}en
arXiv AI
Aug 17

TeachMateGPT: A Multi-Agent Knowledge-Grounded Framework for Pedagogical Assessment Generation from Science Curriculum Materials

arXiv:2608. 13708v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatically generating textbook-grounded assessment items can reduce science teachers' workload, but existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems rely on flat retrieval, support only single-question generation, lack safeguards against weak evidence, and are ill-suited to low-resource, board-exam-structured curricula.

By Fatema Tuj Johora Faria, Mukaffi Bin Moin, M. F. Mridha, Jubayer Al Mahmud
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

AEScorer: An Agentic Evidence-Grounded Framework for Graded Factuality Verification

AEScorer is an agentic evidence‑grounded framework designed for graded factuality verification, addressing the limitation of binary judgments in current methods. It operates in two stages: first, it gathers and refines external evidence through agentic search; second, it predicts a scalar factuality score to capture nuanced differences in correctness. The authors also introduce GradedVeriBench, a benchmark covering general and multi‑hop question answering, and demonstrate that AEScorer outperforms existing approaches on this new benchmark.

By Hui Huang, Muyun Yang, Yuki Arase