arXiv AI By Sergiy Lunyakin

Auditable by Construction: An Ontology-Driven Framework for Trustworthy LLM Analytics in Enterprise Finance

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces the Knowledge-Driven Analytics Framework (KDAF), an ontology‑driven approach for large language model analytics in enterprise finance that prioritizes auditability. KDAF constructs knowledge systems through six iterative stages and retrieves evidence via Context‑Aware Relevance Propagation (CARP), ensuring each fact includes its relationship type, confidence, and source lineage. Evaluation on FinanceBench shows that while retrieval improves accuracy marginally, KDAF significantly outperforms other methods in citation traceability and provenance completeness, demonstrating that auditability is the key advantage of ontology‑grounded retrieval.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
3d ago

FinMultiHopQA: A KG-Grounded Multi-Hop Financial QA Benchmark for Evidence-Driven Reasoning

FinMultiHopQA is a new benchmark comprising 15,600 financial questions that require multi‑hop reasoning across filing sections, fiscal years, and peer companies. It is grounded in FinReflectKG, a temporally indexed financial knowledge graph with over 17.5 million triples derived from SEC 10‑K filings. The benchmark uniquely supports controlled multi‑hop taxonomies, document topologies, motif‑level reproducibility, and provenance‑linked auditability, and it allows researchers to test how different evidence presentations affect large language model performance.

By Abhinav Arun, Reetu Raj Harsh, Bhaskarjit Sarmah, Stefano Pasquali
arXiv AI
Aug 20

FinRCA-Bench: Benchmarking Evidence Retrieval and Reasoning for Financial AI Systems

FinRCA-Bench is a deterministic synthetic benchmark comprising 2,250 accounts‑payable‑to‑bank reconciliation cases that span 14 operational tables and include 1,500 injected failures across 15 causal categories. The benchmark hides root‑cause labels and record‑level evidence contracts from models, enabling independent evaluation of evidence retrieval versus reasoning accuracy. Experiments show that retrieval architecture dramatically influences performance, with retrieval improvements raising macro‑required‑record recall from 0.83% to 77.70% and exact 16‑class accuracy from 2.05% to 72.44%.

By Pratik Ghawate
arXiv AI
Oct 31

What Does an Ontology Catch? Curated, LLM-Generated and Data-Derived Ontologies as Checkers of LLM Agents over Knowledge Graphs

The paper investigates how different types of ontologies—curated, LLM-generated, and data-derived—serve as checkers for large language model agents answering questions over knowledge graphs. By evaluating these ontologies as prompt context, as checkers, or both, across both open-weight and proprietary agents on public and a large private graph, the study quantifies the trade-offs between errors caught and false alarms. It finds that curated ontologies can flag more correct answers than other sources but are only marginally more precise than random, and that combining sources or providing specific feedback offers limited benefits.

By Michal Orzechowski, Rund Tawfiq, Tomasz Kosciolek
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

FinRCA-Bench: Benchmarking Evidence Retrieval and Reasoning for Financial AI Systems

FinRCA-Bench is a synthetic benchmark designed to evaluate evidence retrieval and reasoning in financial AI systems, specifically for accounts‑payable‑to‑bank reconciliation. It contains 2,250 cases across 14 operational tables, with 1,500 injected failures in 15 causal categories and 750 hard‑negative cases, and hides root‑cause labels and evidence contracts to isolate retrieval performance. Experiments show that retrieval architecture dramatically affects accuracy, with structured retrieval methods like Typed Provenance Graph Retrieval vastly improving macro‑recall and exact‑class accuracy compared to dense semantic retrieval or classical ML.